Usage Score
22.1
Player Dossier
2010-2012Oklahoma
WR • 6'1" • Encinitas, CA, USA
Kenny Stills reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
22.1
Efficiency
75.3
Consistency
75
Season Value
68.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Oklahoma
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenny Stills, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Oklahoma. Kenny Stills reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 849 primary output with 83.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
73.8
Efficiency
75.3
Usage
22.1
Consistency
75
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 67. UTEP: 121. Unknown: 120. Kansas State: 60. Texas Tech: 43. Texas: 37. Kansas: 90. Notre Dame: 86. Iowa State: 92. Baylor: 33. West Virginia: 91. Oklahoma State: 103. TCU: 16
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 7 by 63.8. UTEP: 6 by 100. Unknown: 10 by 80. Kansas State: 6 by 66.7. Texas Tech: 7 by 41. Texas: 3 by 82.2. Kansas: 6 by 100. Notre Dame: 7 by 81.9. Iowa State: 6 by 100. Baylor: 3 by 73.3. West Virginia: 10 by 60.7. Oklahoma State: 9 by 76.3. TCU: 2 by 53.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/5 | vs Texas A&M | L 13-41 | — | 7 | 67 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ TCU | W 24-17 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Oklahoma State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 51-48 | — | 9 | 103 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 19 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ West VirginiaHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 50-49 | — | 10 | 91 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 4 | 16 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Baylor | W 42-34 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Iowa State2+ TD | W 35-20 | — | 6 | 92 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 2 | 31 |
| Sun 10/28 | vs Notre Dame | L 13-30 | — | 7 | 86 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Kansas | W 52-7 | — | 6 | 90 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Texas | W 63-21 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Texas Tech | W 41-20 | — | 7 | 43 | 7 | 6.10 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Kansas State | L 19-24 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 10 | 120 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 9/2 | @ UTEP100 receiving yards | W 24-7 | — | 6 | 121 | 18.6 | 20.20 | 1 | 68 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Oklahoma | 786 | 76.6 | 15 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 786 | 76.6 | 15 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Oklahoma | 849 | 83.8 | 21.6 | 63 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 849 | 83.8 | 21.6 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Oklahoma | 959 | 75.3 | 22.1 | 110 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 959 | 75.3 | 22.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas Tech
135
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
120
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Texas Tech
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Oklahoma
849 primary output · 83.8 efficiency · 21.6 usage
68.3
#2
2011 Regular Season · Oklahoma
68.3
849 primary · 83.8 efficiency · 21.6 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Oklahoma
68.1
959 primary · 75.3 efficiency · 22.1 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.9477
La Costa Canyon · Encinitas, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,594
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kenny Stills quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit