Usage Score
26.5
Player Dossier
2010-2014Nebraska
WR • 6'1" • Boulder, CO, USA
Kenny Bell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
26.5
Efficiency
83.1
Consistency
71
Season Value
69.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Nebraska
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenny Bell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Nebraska. Kenny Bell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Nebraska paired 863 primary output with 89.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
60.6
Efficiency
83.1
Usage
26.5
Consistency
71
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 71. Florida Atlantic: 116. Unknown: 14. Fresno State: 84. Miami: 70. Illinois: 105. Michigan State: 31. Northwestern: 89. Rutgers: 63. Purdue: 5. Wisconsin: 14. Minnesota: 73. Iowa: 53
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 7 by 67.6. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 93.3. Fresno State: 5 by 100. Miami: 4 by 100. Illinois: 5 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 68.9. Northwestern: 5 by 100. Rutgers: 6 by 70. Purdue: 1 by 33.3. Wisconsin: 2 by 46.7. Minnesota: 1 by 100. Iowa: 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/28 | @ USC | L 42-45 | — | 7 | 71 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 18 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Iowa2+ TD | W 37-34 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Minnesota | L 24-28 | — | 1 | 73 | 73 | 73 | 0 | 73 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Wisconsin | L 24-59 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Purdue | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Rutgers | W 42-24 | — | 6 | 63 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Northwestern | W 38-17 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/5 | @ Michigan State | L 22-27 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/28 | vs Illinois100 receiving yards | W 45-14 | — | 5 | 105 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 63 |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Miami | W 41-31 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 40 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Fresno State | W 55-19 | — | 5 | 84 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Florida Atlantic100 receiving yards | W 55-7 | — | 4 | 116 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 63 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Nebraska
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Nebraska | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Nebraska | 461 | 78.5 | 20.8 | 461 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Nebraska | 461 | 78.5 | 20.8 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Nebraska | 863 | 89.9 | 22.2 | 402 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Nebraska | 863 | 89.9 | 22.2 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Nebraska | 577 | 76.1 | 24.3 | -286 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Nebraska | 577 | 76.1 | 24.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Nebraska | 788 | 83.1 | 26.5 | 211 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Nebraska | 788 | 83.1 | 26.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93
Primary metric
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Minnesota
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Illinois
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio State
133
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Nebraska
863 primary output · 89.9 efficiency · 22.2 usage
69.3
#2
2012 Regular Season · Nebraska
69.3
863 primary · 89.9 efficiency · 22.2 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Nebraska
69.2
788 primary · 83.1 efficiency · 26.5 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8756
Fairview · Boulder, CO
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,689
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kenny Bell quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit