Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2010-2014Missouri
? • 5'9" • DeSoto, TX, USA
Marcus Murphy shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
9.5
Season Value
5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Missouri
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marcus Murphy, ?. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Missouri. Marcus Murphy shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Missouri paired 10 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Primary Metric / G
0.4
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
9.5
Best Game by takeover score
Minnesota
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 0. Unknown: 0. Toledo: 1. UCF: 0. Indiana: 0. South Carolina: 0. Georgia: 0. Florida: 1. Vanderbilt: 0. Kentucky: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Tennessee: 2. Arkansas: 1. Alabama: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
— vs Minnesota
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | @ Minnesota | W 33-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 157 | 13.10 | 0 | 69 |
| Sat 12/6 | vs Alabama | L 13-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 20 | 2.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Arkansas | W 21-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | 58 | 5.30 | 1 | 12 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Tennessee | W 29-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 82 | 4.30 | 2 | 15 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Texas A&M | W 34-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 88 | 4.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Kentucky | W 20-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13 | 52 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Vanderbilt | W 24-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 93 | 5.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Florida | W 42-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 27 | 3.40 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Georgia | L 0-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 34 | 4.90 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ South Carolina | W 21-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 98 | 6.10 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Indiana | L 27-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs UCF | W 38-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 94 | 6.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Toledo | W 49-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13 | 56 | 4.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 54 | 6 | 0 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Missouri
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Missouri | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Missouri | 2 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Missouri | 0 | — | — | -2 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Missouri | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| 2013 Postseason | Missouri | 10 | — | — | 9 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Missouri | 10 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Missouri | 5 | — | — | -5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Missouri | 5 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Miami (OH)
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Missouri
10 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
30.8
#2
2013 Regular Season · Missouri
30.8
10 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Missouri
5
5 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8756
DeSoto · DeSoto, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
25
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Marcus Murphy quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit