Usage Score
29.6
Player Dossier
2010-2013Missouri
James Franklin
QB • 6'2" • Corinth, TX, USA
Pass-first distributorVolume operator
James Franklin is a pass-first distributor with 29.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
66.3
Consistency
81.5
Season Value
64.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Missouri
10101111121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Missouri
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
James Franklin, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Missouri. James Franklin is a pass-first distributor with 29.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Missouri paired 3,846 primary output with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 66.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Missouri
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
293.9
Efficiency
66.3
Usage
29.6
Consistency
81.5
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 210. Unknown: 362. Toledo: 289. Indiana: 404. Arkansas State: 289. Vanderbilt: 341. Georgia: 182. Ole Miss: 184. Texas A&M: 313. Auburn: 365
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 56 by 46.6. Unknown: 44 by 77.9. Toledo: 42 by 66. Indiana: 60 by 64.7. Arkansas State: 35 by 76.8. Vanderbilt: 40 by 75.8. Georgia: 39 by 57.3. Ole Miss: 27 by 64.2. Texas A&M: 46 by 69.5. Auburn: 52 by 63.9
Split Comparison
Wins276.5 · n=8
First Half310.8 · n=5 · +33.8 vs Second Half
Second Half277 · n=5 · -33.8 vs First Half
All Games293.9 · n=10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
77.9 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/4 | vs Oklahoma State | W 41-31 | 15 | 40 | 174 | 37.5 | 0 | 1 | 46.6 | 16 | 36 | 2.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Auburn300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 42-59 | 21 | 37 | 303 | 56.8 | 3 | 1 | 63.9 | 15 | 62 | 4.10 | 1 | 12 |
| Sun 12/1 | vs Texas A&MDual-threat | W 28-21 | 18 | 28 | 233 | 64.3 | 2 | 0 | 69.5 | 18 | 80 | 4.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Ole Miss | W 24-10 | 12 | 19 | 142 | 63.2 | 0 | 1 | 64.2 | 8 | 42 | 5.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Georgia | W 41-26 | 18 | 27 | 170 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 57.3 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Vanderbilt3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 51-28 | 19 | 28 | 278 | 67.9 | 4 | 0 | 75.8 | 12 | 63 | 5.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Arkansas State3+ TD | W 41-19 | 21 | 30 | 256 | 70.0 | 3 | 0 | 76.8 | 5 | 33 | 6.60 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ Indiana300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 45-28 | 32 | 47 | 343 | 68.1 | 2 | 2 | 64.7 | 13 | 61 | 4.70 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs ToledoDual-threat | W 38-23 | 16 | 25 | 212 | 64.0 | 1 | 1 | 66 | 17 | 77 | 4.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown300-yard game · 3+ TD | — | 26 | 38 | 318 | 68.4 | 3 | 0 | 77.9 | 6 | 44 | 7.30 | 0 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Missouri
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201020112011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Missouri | 222 | 46.3 | 7.7 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Missouri | 222 | 46.3 | 7.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Missouri | 3,846 | 64.5 | 38.8 | 3,624 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Missouri | 3,846 | 64.5 | 38.8 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Missouri | 1,684 | 60 | 29.8 | -2,162 |
| 2013 Postseason | Missouri | 2,939 | 66.3 | 29.6 | 1,255 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Missouri | 2,939 | 66.3 | 29.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
403
Primary metric
403 total offense with 64.1 efficiency.
#2
Oklahoma
394
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
394 total offense with 65.8 efficiency.
#3
Georgia
294
Primary metric
Loss with 294 yards of offense and 54.6 efficiency.
294 total offense with 54.6 efficiency.
#4
Baylor
392
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
392 total offense with 68.1 efficiency.
#5
Texas Tech
324
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
324 total offense with 78.2 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Missouri
3,846 primary output · 64.5 efficiency · 38.8 usage
71.3
#2
2011 Regular Season · Missouri
71.3
3,846 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 38.8 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Missouri
64.5
2,939 primary · 66.3 efficiency · 29.6 usage
Milestones
19
250+ passing yards
10
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
26
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.9101
Lake Dallas · Lake Dallas, TX
- Committed To
- Missouri
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
8,691
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.