Usage Score
25.1
Player Dossier
2010-2012Clemson
DeAndre Hopkins
WR • 6'2" • Central, SC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
DeAndre Hopkins reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
93.8
Consistency
68
Season Value
71.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Clemson
101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DeAndre Hopkins, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Clemson. DeAndre Hopkins reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Clemson paired 1,405 primary output with 93.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 93.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Clemson
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
108.1
Efficiency
93.8
Usage
25.1
Consistency
68
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 191. Auburn: 119. Ball State: 105. Unknown: 95. Florida State: 88. Boston College: 197. Georgia Tech: 173. Virginia Tech: 68. Wake Forest: 64. Duke: 128. Maryland: 59. NC State: 75. South Carolina: 43
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 13 by 97.9. Auburn: 13 by 61. Ball State: 6 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 90.5. Florida State: 5 by 100. Boston College: 11 by 100. Georgia Tech: 7 by 100. Virginia Tech: 3 by 100. Wake Forest: 6 by 71.1. Duke: 4 by 100. Maryland: 4 by 98.3. NC State: 2 by 100. South Carolina: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins117.9 · n=10 · +52.4 vs Losses
Losses65.5 · n=2 · -52.4 vs Wins
First Half138.3 · n=7 · +65.5 vs Second Half
Second Half72.8 · n=6 · -65.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs LSU100 receiving yards · High volume | W 25-24 | — | 13 | 191 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 2 | 31 |
| Sun 11/25 | vs South Carolina | L 17-27 | — | 1 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs NC State | W 62-48 | — | 2 | 75 | 37.5 | 37.50 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Maryland | W 45-10 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Duke100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 56-20 | — | 4 | 128 | 32 | 32 | 3 | 58 |
| Thu 10/25 | @ Wake Forest | W 42-13 | — | 6 | 64 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Virginia Tech | W 38-17 | — | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Georgia Tech100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 47-31 | — | 7 | 173 | 24.7 | 24.70 | 2 | 58 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Boston College100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-31 | — | 11 | 197 | 17.9 | 17.90 | 1 | 58 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ Florida State | L 37-49 | — | 5 | 88 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 95 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Ball State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 52-27 | — | 6 | 105 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 3 | 34 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Auburn100 receiving yards · High volume | W 26-19 | — | 13 | 119 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 1 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Clemson | 626 | 78.2 | 24.2 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Clemson | 626 | 78.2 | 24.2 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Clemson | 978 | 81.9 | 23 | 352 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Clemson | 978 | 81.9 | 23 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Clemson | 1,405 | 93.8 | 25.1 | 427 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Clemson | 1,405 | 93.8 | 25.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
124
Primary metric
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Boston College
197
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
197 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
North Carolina
157
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
157 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
LSU
191
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
191 receiving yards with a 97.9 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia Tech
173
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Clemson
1,405 primary output · 93.8 efficiency · 25.1 usage
71.7
#2
2012 Regular Season · Clemson
71.7
1,405 primary · 93.8 efficiency · 25.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Clemson
62.7
978 primary · 81.9 efficiency · 23 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.9186
D.W. Daniel · Central, SC
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,009
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.