Player Stats

Andre Williams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,799
Rushing yards
3,739
Receiving yards
60
Touchdowns
28

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2010 PostseasonBoston College1175705138.1
2010 Regular SeasonBoston College1140139110138.1
2011 Regular SeasonBoston College1052851711449.3
2012 Regular SeasonBoston College961858434454.7
2013 PostseasonBoston College1375750181.4
2013 Regular SeasonBoston College132,1022,10201781.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

Boston College paired 2,177 primary output with 57.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 57.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: NC State

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Boston College

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

167.5

Efficiency

57.8

Usage

52.2

Consistency

67.6

Best Game by takeover score

NC State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 75. Villanova: 114. Wake Forest: 204. USC: 38. Florida State: 149. Army: 263. Clemson: 70. North Carolina: 172. Virginia Tech: 166. New Mexico State: 295. NC State: 339. Maryland: 263. Syracuse: 29

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 26 by 30. Villanova: 23 by 51.6. Wake Forest: 35 by 60.7. USC: 17 by 23.3. Florida State: 28 by 55.4. Army: 30 by 86.5. Clemson: 24 by 30.4. North Carolina: 26 by 68.9. Virginia Tech: 33 by 52.4. New Mexico State: 30 by 91. NC State: 42 by 83.6. Maryland: 32 by 84.2. Syracuse: 9 by 33.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins234.9 · Games = 7 · +146.0 vs Losses
Losses88.8 · Games = 6 · -146.0 vs Wins