Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Boston College paired 2,177 primary output with 57.8 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Boston College | 11 | 75 | 70 | 5 | 1 | 38.1 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Boston College | 11 | 401 | 391 | 10 | 1 | 38.1 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Boston College | 10 | 528 | 517 | 11 | 4 | 49.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Boston College | 9 | 618 | 584 | 34 | 4 | 54.7 |
| 2013 Postseason | Boston College | 13 | 75 | 75 | 0 | 1 | 81.4 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Boston College | 13 | 2,102 | 2,102 | 0 | 17 | 81.4 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Boston College paired 2,177 primary output with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: NC State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
167.5
Efficiency
57.8
Usage
52.2
Consistency
67.6
Best Game by takeover score
NC State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 75. Villanova: 114. Wake Forest: 204. USC: 38. Florida State: 149. Army: 263. Clemson: 70. North Carolina: 172. Virginia Tech: 166. New Mexico State: 295. NC State: 339. Maryland: 263. Syracuse: 29
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 26 by 30. Villanova: 23 by 51.6. Wake Forest: 35 by 60.7. USC: 17 by 23.3. Florida State: 28 by 55.4. Army: 30 by 86.5. Clemson: 24 by 30.4. North Carolina: 26 by 68.9. Virginia Tech: 33 by 52.4. New Mexico State: 30 by 91. NC State: 42 by 83.6. Maryland: 32 by 84.2. Syracuse: 9 by 33.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.