Usage Score
46.4
Player Dossier
2010-2013Boston College
Alex Amidon
WR • 6'0" • Greenfield, MA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Alex Amidon reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.1
Consistency
68.1
Season Value
68.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Boston College
101011121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Boston College
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Amidon, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Boston College. Alex Amidon reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Boston College paired 1,210 primary output with 91.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 69.2th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Boston College
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
79.4
Efficiency
79.1
Usage
46.4
Consistency
68.1
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 129. Unknown: 146. Wake Forest: 93. USC: 23. Florida State: 42. Army: 122. Clemson: 121. North Carolina: 38. Virginia Tech: 53. New Mexico State: 88. NC State: 34. Maryland: 83. Syracuse: 60
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 10 by 86. Unknown: 13 by 74.9. Wake Forest: 5 by 100. USC: 2 by 76.7. Florida State: 7 by 40. Army: 5 by 100. Clemson: 6 by 100. North Carolina: 8 by 31.7. Virginia Tech: 3 by 100. New Mexico State: 8 by 73.3. NC State: 5 by 45.3. Maryland: 2 by 100. Syracuse: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins78.8 · n=6 · +10 vs Losses
Losses68.8 · n=6 · -10 vs Wins
First Half96.6 · n=7 · +37.2 vs Second Half
Second Half59.3 · n=6 · -37.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Syracuse
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | vs Arizona100 receiving yards · High volume | L 19-42 | — | 10 | 129 | 11.4 | 12.90 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Syracuse | L 31-34 | — | 3 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Maryland | W 29-26 | — | 2 | 83 | 41.5 | 41.50 | 1 | 74 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs NC State | W 38-21 | — | 5 | 34 | 8.2 | 6.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ New Mexico StateHigh volume | W 48-34 | — | 8 | 88 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Virginia Tech | W 34-27 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ North CarolinaHigh volume | L 10-34 | — | 8 | 38 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Clemson100 receiving yards | L 14-24 | — | 6 | 121 | 16.6 | 20.20 | 1 | 69 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Army100 receiving yards | W 48-27 | — | 5 | 122 | 21.2 | 24.40 | 0 | 68 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Florida State | L 34-48 | — | 7 | 42 | 6.1 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ USC | L 7-35 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Wake Forest | W 24-10 | — | 5 | 93 | 18.6 | 18.60 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 13 | 146 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 1 | 49 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Boston College
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020102011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Boston College | 338 | 81.1 | 16.5 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Boston College | 338 | 81.1 | 16.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Boston College | 220 | 67.4 | 14.2 | -118 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Boston College | 1,210 | 91.9 | 29.7 | 990 |
| 2013 Postseason | Boston College | 1,032 | 79.1 | 46.4 | -178 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Boston College | 1,032 | 79.1 | 46.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93
Primary metric
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
NC State
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
129
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 86 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
146
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 74.9 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
193
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
193 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Boston College
1,210 primary output · 91.9 efficiency · 29.7 usage
73
#2
2013 Postseason · Boston College
68.7
1,032 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 46.4 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Boston College
68.7
1,032 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 46.4 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8289
The Hotchkiss School · Lakeville, CT
- Committed To
- Boston College
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,800
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.