Usage Score
37.5
Player Dossier
2010-2012Oklahoma State
Joseph Randle
RB • 6'1" • Wichita, KS, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Joseph Randle leans workhorse runner traits and 55.4 efficiency.
Efficiency
55.4
Consistency
70.5
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Oklahoma State
101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joseph Randle, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Joseph Randle leans workhorse runner traits and 55.4 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 1,641 primary output with 55.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 55.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
126.2
Efficiency
55.4
Usage
37.5
Consistency
70.5
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 66. Unknown: 107. Arizona: 193. Louisiana: 112. Texas: 211. Kansas: 85. Iowa State: 174. TCU: 163. Kansas State: 52. West Virginia: 83. Texas Tech: 91. Oklahoma: 142. Baylor: 162
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 17 by 40.4. Unknown: 6 by 100. Arizona: 31 by 59.4. Louisiana: 22 by 52.5. Texas: 27 by 82.3. Kansas: 30 by 29. Iowa State: 27 by 66.2. TCU: 37 by 43. Kansas State: 16 by 31.5. West Virginia: 22 by 37.7. Texas Tech: 17 by 55.8. Oklahoma: 23 by 59.4. Baylor: 27 by 62.8
Split Comparison
Wins110.6 · n=7 · -41.4 vs Losses
Losses152 · n=5 · +41.4 vs Wins
First Half135.4 · n=7 · +19.9 vs Second Half
Second Half115.5 · n=6 · -19.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs Purdue | W 58-14 | 17 | 66 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ Baylor100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 34-41 | 23 | 139 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 23 | 6 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Oklahoma100 rush yards · 2+ TD | L 48-51 | 21 | 113 | 5.40 | 4 | 2 | 29 | 6.2 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Texas Tech | W 59-21 | 17 | 91 | 5.40 | 1 | — | — | 5.4 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs West Virginia | W 55-34 | 21 | 74 | 3.50 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3.8 |
| Sun 11/4 | @ Kansas State | L 30-44 | 15 | 43 | 2.90 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3.3 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs TCU100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 36-14 | 32 | 126 | 3.90 | 1 | 5 | 37 | 4.4 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Iowa State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-10 | 24 | 151 | 6.30 | 2 | 3 | 23 | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Kansas | W 20-14 | 29 | 80 | 2.80 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2.8 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Texas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 36-41 | 25 | 199 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 7.8 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Louisiana100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 65-24 | 21 | 105 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5.1 |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Arizona100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 38-59 | 23 | 123 | 5.30 | 0 | 8 | 70 | 6.2 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown100 rush yards · 2+ TD | — | 6 | 107 | 17.80 | 2 | — | — | 17.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 879 | 63.1 | 14.5 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 879 | 63.1 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,482 | 58.4 | 31.4 | 603 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,482 | 58.4 | 31.4 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,641 | 55.4 | 37.5 | 159 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,641 | 55.4 | 37.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
211
Primary metric
211 scrimmage yards and 46.6 usage.
#2
Arizona
220
Primary metric
Win with 220 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
220 scrimmage yards and 32.9 usage.
#3
Oklahoma
182
Primary metric
Win with 182 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
182 scrimmage yards and 40.4 usage.
#4
Kansas State
123
Primary metric
Win with 123 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
123 scrimmage yards and 19 usage.
#5
Arizona
193
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
193 scrimmage yards and 44.9 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Oklahoma State
1,641 primary output · 55.4 efficiency · 37.5 usage
65.8
#2
2012 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
65.8
1,641 primary · 55.4 efficiency · 37.5 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Oklahoma State
62.4
1,482 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 31.4 usage
Milestones
19
100+ rush yards
9
150+ scrimmage yards
13
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8956
Southeast · Wichita, KS
- Committed To
- Oklahoma State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4,002
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.