Player Stats

Jake Heaps College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
4,904
Passing yards
5,233
Touchdowns
35

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2010 PostseasonBYU132642640461
2010 Regular SeasonBYU131,9522,052-1001261
2011 Regular SeasonBYU91,3951,452-571050.1
2012 Regular SeasonKansas00000-
2013 Regular SeasonKansas111,2521,414-162947.6
2014 Regular SeasonMiami44151-10020.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

BYU paired 2,216 primary output with 53.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 36.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across BYU, Kansas, Miami.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida A&M

Win with 42 yards of offense and 53.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Miami

Games

4

Primary Metric / G

10.3

Efficiency

36.9

Usage

3

Consistency

36.2

Best Game by takeover score

Florida A&M

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida A&M: 42. Arkansas State: 2. Cincinnati: -13. North Carolina: 10

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida A&M: 9 by 53.8. Arkansas State: 3 by 30. Cincinnati: 1 by 0. North Carolina: 2 by 63.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half22 · Games = 2 · +23.5 vs Second Half
Second Half-1.5 · Games = 2 · -23.5 vs First Half