Usage / Role
7%
Rotational offensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2010-2013Toledo
James Green
WR • 6'3" • Miami, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
James Green reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Impact Production
24
Developing production for a receiver
lowelite
Reliability
20
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
33
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Toledo
10111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 4
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
4★
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
James Green, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Toledo. James Green reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 292
- Receptions
- 26
- Touchdowns
- 2
Quick Answers
James Green quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Toledo · WR
- Career Receiving Yards
- 292
- Tracked sample
- 4 unique seasons · 4 entries · 18 games
- Best season
- 2012 Regular Season · Toledo
- Top game
- Central Michigan
- Recruit profile
- 4-star · Tallahassee Leon · Toledo
- High school pipeline
- Tallahassee Leon · 14 FBS recruits · 0 drafted players
- Latest roster
- No. 8 · Class 2013
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 6 | 9 | 70 | 0 | 58.2 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 6 | 9 | 118 | 1 | 60 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Toledo | 6 | 8 | 104 | 1 | 60.7 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Keep exploring James Green
James Green played WR for Toledo. Across 4 tracked seasons, James Green recorded 292 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Toledo.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Toledo paired 104 primary output with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Toledo
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
17.3
Efficiency
74
Usage
7
Consistency
57.4
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 4. Coastal Carolina: 0. Western Michigan: 23. Central Michigan: 40. Eastern Michigan: 24. Northern Illinois: 13
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 1 by 26.7. Western Michigan: 2 by 76.7. Central Michigan: 2 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 80. Northern Illinois: 1 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins18.2 · Games = 5 · +5.2 vs Losses
Losses13 · Games = 1 · -5.2 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Central Michigan
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2010201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 70 | 58.3 | 9.3 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 118 | 70 | 6.3 | 48 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Toledo | 104 | 74 | 7 | -14 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | -104 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
@ Central Michigan
Week 12 · W 44-17 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Receiving Yards
75.9 takeover
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Central Michigan
Week 6 · W 50-35 · Conference game
40
Receiving Yards
75.6 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs Central Michigan
Week 13 · W 42-31 · Conference game
17
Receiving Yards
71.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Boise State
Week 3 · L 15-40
30
Receiving Yards
65.7 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
@ Eastern Michigan
Week 7 · W 52-47 · Conference game
24
Receiving Yards
57.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · Toledo
104 primary output · 74 efficiency · 7 usage
60.7
#2
2011 Regular Season · Toledo
60
118 primary · 70 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Toledo
58.2
70 primary · 58.3 efficiency · 9.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Keep exploring James Green
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.