Usage Score
12.2
Player Dossier
2010-2013Stanford
RB • 6'1" • Foothill Ranch, CA, USA
Anthony Wilkerson leans balanced backfield option traits and 41.6 efficiency.
Usage Score
12.2
Efficiency
41.6
Consistency
47.8
Season Value
47
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Wilkerson, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Stanford. Anthony Wilkerson leans balanced backfield option traits and 41.6 efficiency.
Anthony Wilkerson played RB for Stanford. Across 4 tracked seasons, Anthony Wilkerson recorded 1,267 rushing yards, 97 receiving yards, and 9 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Stanford.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Stanford paired 455 primary output with 45.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 41.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: San José State
Win with 79 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
30.6
Efficiency
41.6
Usage
12.2
Consistency
47.8
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 7. San José State: 79. Army: 11. Arizona State: 86. Washington State: 47. Washington: 29. Utah: 2. UCLA: -9. Oregon: 25. USC: 9. California: 21. Notre Dame: 34. Arizona State: 57
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 1 by 58.3. San José State: 11 by 75.1. Army: 4 by 28.6. Arizona State: 20 by 41.5. Washington State: 10 by 49. Washington: 7 by 41.2. Utah: 2 by 10.4. UCLA: 4 by 0. Oregon: 6 by 43.4. USC: 3 by 31.3. California: 7 by 31.3. Notre Dame: 5 by 70.8. Arizona State: 10 by 59.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
San José State
Best efficiency game
75.1 vs San José State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Michigan State | L 20-24 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Sun 12/8 | @ Arizona State | W 38-14 | 10 | 57 | 5.70 | 0 | — | — | 5.7 |
| Sun 12/1 | vs Notre Dame | W 27-20 | 5 | 34 | 6.80 | 1 | — | — | 6.8 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs California | W 63-13 | 7 | 21 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ USC | L 17-20 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Fri 11/8 | vs Oregon | W 26-20 | 6 | 25 | 4.20 | 0 | — | — | 4.2 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs UCLA | W 24-10 | 4 | -9 | -2.30 | 0 | — | — | -2.3 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Utah | L 21-27 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sun 10/6 | vs Washington | W 31-28 | 6 | 23 | 3.80 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4.1 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Washington State | W 55-17 | 10 | 47 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Arizona State | W 42-28 | 18 | 68 | 3.80 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 4.3 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Army | W 34-20 | 4 | 11 | 2.80 | 0 | — | — | 2.8 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs San José State | W 34-13 | 9 | 65 | 7.20 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7.2 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Stanford | 455 | 45.5 | 11.4 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Stanford | 455 | 45.5 | 11.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Stanford | 288 | 48.3 | 7.9 | -167 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 288 | 48.3 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Stanford | 223 | 51.1 | 8.2 | -65 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 223 | 51.1 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Stanford | 398 | 41.6 | 12.2 | 175 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 398 | 41.6 | 12.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
81
Primary metric
81 scrimmage yards and 15.6 usage.
#2
Washington
93
Primary metric
Win with 93 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
93 scrimmage yards and 23.3 usage.
#3
San José State
79
Primary metric
Win with 79 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
79 scrimmage yards and 19.6 usage.
#4
Arizona State
86
Primary metric
Win with 86 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
86 scrimmage yards and 33.9 usage.
#5
UCLA
48
Primary metric
Win with 48 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
48 scrimmage yards and 21 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Stanford
455 primary output · 45.5 efficiency · 11.4 usage
52.5
#2
2010 Regular Season · Stanford
52.5
455 primary · 45.5 efficiency · 11.4 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Stanford
47
398 primary · 41.6 efficiency · 12.2 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.9403
Tustin · Tustin, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,364
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.