Player Stats

Brennan Clay College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,229
Rushing yards
1,913
Receiving yards
316
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2010 PostseasonOklahoma8000029.3
2010 Regular SeasonOklahoma814012713029.3
2011 PostseasonOklahoma11674423038.7
2011 Regular SeasonOklahoma1131123081138.7
2012 PostseasonOklahoma13544410053.3
2012 Regular SeasonOklahoma1360151190753.3
2013 PostseasonOklahoma13804436071.7
2013 Regular SeasonOklahoma1397691363671.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

Oklahoma paired 1,056 primary output with 55.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Oklahoma

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

81.2

Efficiency

55.4

Usage

24.2

Consistency

62.3

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 80. UL Monroe: 43. West Virginia: 170. Tulsa: 49. Notre Dame: 84. TCU: 132. Texas: 38. Kansas: 33. Texas Tech: 42. Baylor: 19. Iowa State: 86. Kansas State: 200. Oklahoma State: 80

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 24 by 30.1. UL Monroe: 8 by 56. West Virginia: 22 by 80.5. Tulsa: 15 by 34. Notre Dame: 16 by 56.3. TCU: 13 by 92.3. Texas: 6 by 58.9. Kansas: 7 by 40.5. Texas Tech: 11 by 39.8. Baylor: 6 by 33. Iowa State: 7 by 100. Kansas State: 31 by 67.2. Oklahoma State: 25 by 31.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins90.8 · Games = 11 · +62.3 vs Losses
Losses28.5 · Games = 2 · -62.3 vs Wins