Player Stats

Zach Trujillo College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
572
Receptions
26
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonKansas State0-00-
2011 Regular SeasonKansas State0-00-
2012 Regular SeasonKansas State5272039.4
2013 Regular SeasonKansas State55111155.9
2014 Regular SeasonKansas State1119389267.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season

Kansas State paired 389 primary output with 86.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 86.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTEP

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Kansas State

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

35.4

Efficiency

86.1

Usage

9.9

Consistency

52.4

Best Game by takeover score

UTEP

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Stephen F. Austin: 29. Iowa State: 32. Auburn: 27. UTEP: 75. Texas Tech: 0. Texas: 3. Oklahoma State: 13. TCU: 39. West Virginia: 67. Kansas: 16. Baylor: 88

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stephen F. Austin: 3 by 64.4. Iowa State: 1 by 100. Auburn: 2 by 90. UTEP: 3 by 100. Texas: 1 by 20. Oklahoma State: 1 by 86.7. TCU: 2 by 100. West Virginia: 2 by 100. Kansas: 1 by 100. Baylor: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins29.4 · Games = 8 · -22.0 vs Losses
Losses51.3 · Games = 3 · +22.0 vs Wins