Player Stats

DeMarcus Robinson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
558
Rushing yards
482
Receiving yards
76
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonKansas State00000-
2011 Regular SeasonKansas State00000-
2012 Regular SeasonKansas State325250018.1
2013 Regular SeasonKansas State320200014.1
2014 PostseasonKansas State13817162
2014 Regular SeasonKansas State1350543669562

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Kansas State paired 513 primary output with 40.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 40.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Stephen F. Austin

Win with 96 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Kansas State

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

39.5

Efficiency

40.9

Usage

16.3

Consistency

60.4

Best Game by takeover score

Stephen F. Austin

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 8. Stephen F. Austin: 96. Iowa State: 38. Auburn: 25. UTEP: 56. Texas Tech: 57. Oklahoma: 66. Texas: 50. Oklahoma State: 6. TCU: 21. West Virginia: 0. Kansas: 64. Baylor: 26

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 8 by 5.1. Stephen F. Austin: 15 by 54.5. Iowa State: 9 by 36.3. Auburn: 8 by 32.6. UTEP: 9 by 64.8. Texas Tech: 17 by 34.9. Oklahoma: 8 by 84.4. Texas: 16 by 32.6. Oklahoma State: 5 by 17.5. TCU: 7 by 31.3. West Virginia: 7 by 0. Kansas: 8 by 83.3. Baylor: 5 by 54.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.1 · Games = 9 · +28.1 vs Losses
Losses20 · Games = 4 · -28.1 vs Wins