Player Stats

Rishard Matthews College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,243
Receptions
147
Touchdowns
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2010 PostseasonNevada14786267.8
2010 Regular SeasonNevada1449793667.8
2011 Regular SeasonNevada12911,364988.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season

Nevada paired 1,364 primary output with 85.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 85.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UNLV

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Regular Season · Nevada

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

113.7

Efficiency

85.9

Usage

36.9

Consistency

68

Best Game by takeover score

UNLV

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 100. San José State: 77. Texas Tech: 107. Boise State: 84. UNLV: 220. New Mexico: 44. Fresno State: 148. New Mexico State: 60. Hawai'i: 118. Louisiana Tech: 87. Utah State: 205. Idaho: 114

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 8 by 83.3. San José State: 7 by 73.3. Texas Tech: 5 by 100. Boise State: 4 by 100. UNLV: 10 by 100. New Mexico: 4 by 73.3. Fresno State: 7 by 100. New Mexico State: 6 by 66.7. Hawai'i: 8 by 98.3. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 72.5. Utah State: 12 by 100. Idaho: 12 by 63.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins111.6 · Games = 7 · -5.0 vs Losses
Losses116.6 · Games = 5 · +5.0 vs Wins