Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Virginia Tech paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 55.8 |
| 2012 Postseason | Virginia Tech | 2 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 2 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2013 Postseason | Virginia Tech | 12 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 77.9 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 12 | 49 | 635 | 2 | 77.9 |
| 2014 Postseason | Virginia Tech | 12 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 57.5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 12 | 44 | 374 | 0 | 57.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Virginia Tech paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 54.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
32.3
Efficiency
54.7
Usage
17.8
Consistency
57.3
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 14. William & Mary: 49. Ohio State: 51. East Carolina: 30. Georgia Tech: 56. Western Michigan: 21. North Carolina: 24. Pittsburgh: 22. Miami: 3. Boston College: 68. Wake Forest: 23. Virginia: 27
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 3 by 31.1. William & Mary: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 5 by 68. East Carolina: 6 by 33.3. Georgia Tech: 7 by 53.3. Western Michigan: 3 by 46.7. North Carolina: 5 by 32. Pittsburgh: 4 by 36.7. Miami: 1 by 20. Boston College: 6 by 75.6. Wake Forest: 1 by 100. Virginia: 3 by 60
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.