Player Dossier

2010-2014

Wake Forest

E.J. Scott

WR • 5'11" • Ellicott City, MD, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

E.J. Scott reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

23.5

Efficiency

66.9

Consistency

72.1

Season Value

63.6

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Virginia

1011121314

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
Virginia • Wake Forest
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

E.J. Scott, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Virginia. E.J. Scott reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

E.J. Scott played WR for Virginia and Wake Forest. Across 5 tracked seasons, E.J. Scott recorded 41 rushing yards, 933 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Wake Forest.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season

Virginia paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 66.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Virginia, Wake Forest.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Unknown

Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

42.8

Efficiency

66.9

Usage

23.5

Consistency

72.1

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UL Monroe: 32. Unknown: 62. Utah State: 62. Army: 64. Louisville: 19. Florida State: 28. Syracuse: 48. Boston College: 58. Clemson: 11. NC State: 50. Virginia Tech: 54. Duke: 25

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UL Monroe: 3 by 71.1. Unknown: 4 by 100. Utah State: 5 by 82.7. Army: 5 by 85.3. Louisville: 5 by 25.3. Florida State: 4 by 46.7. Syracuse: 5 by 64. Boston College: 4 by 96.7. Clemson: 2 by 36.7. NC State: 5 by 66.7. Virginia Tech: 5 by 72. Duke: 3 by 55.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins59 · Games = 2 · +22 vs Losses
Losses37 · Games = 9 · -22 vs Wins
First Half44.5 · Games = 6 · +3.5 vs Second Half
Second Half41 · Games = 6 · -3.5 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Unknown

Best efficiency game

100 vs Unknown

Result
Sun 11/30@ DukeL 21-413258.38.30016
Sat 11/22vs Virginia TechW 6-355413.310.80025
Sat 11/15@ NC StateL 13-425501010029
Fri 11/7vs ClemsonL 20-342115.55.5006
Sat 10/25vs Boston CollegeL 17-2345812.214.50027
Sat 10/18vs SyracuseL 7-305489.29.60016
Sat 10/4@ Florida StateL 3-434284.6708
Sat 9/27@ LouisvilleL 10-205193.83.8007
Sat 9/20vs ArmyW 24-2156410.312.80136
Sat 9/13@ Utah StateL 24-3656212.412.40123
Sat 9/6vs Unknown2+ TD46215.515.50221
Thu 8/28@ UL MonroeL 10-1733210.710.70017

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Virginia

    2010-2013

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Wake Forest

    2014

    Final stop

Season Progression

20102011201220132014
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2010 Regular SeasonVirginia0
2011 Regular SeasonVirginia00
2012 Regular SeasonVirginia3906711.5390
2013 Regular SeasonVirginia3066.74.5-360
2014 Regular SeasonWake Forest51366.923.5483

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Duke

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

98

Primary metric

98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Unknown

62

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Boston College

58

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.

#4

Army

64

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

64 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.

#5

Utah State

62

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2011 Regular Season · Virginia

0 primary output · efficiency · usage

100

#2

2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest

63.6

513 primary · 66.9 efficiency · 23.5 usage

#3

2012 Regular Season · Virginia

49.3

390 primary · 67 efficiency · 11.5 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2010 · Rating 0.8533

Our Lady of Good Counsel · Olney, MD

Committed To
Virginia
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2010

Career Facts

2

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

933

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.