Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2010-2013Miami
TE • 6'5" • Sacramento, CA, USA
Asante Cleveland reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.9
Efficiency
46.7
Consistency
64.5
Season Value
36
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Miami
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Asante Cleveland, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Miami. Asante Cleveland reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Asante Cleveland played TE for Miami. Across 4 tracked seasons, Asante Cleveland recorded 151 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Miami.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Miami paired 110 primary output with 85.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 46.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
11.5
Efficiency
46.7
Usage
8.9
Consistency
64.5
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 18. Pittsburgh: 5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
60 vs Wake Forest
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Miami
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Miami | 110 | 85.3 | 8.7 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Miami | 110 | 85.3 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Miami | 6 | 40 | 5.3 | -104 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Miami | 12 | 40 | 7.1 | 6 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Miami | 23 | 46.7 | 8.9 | 11 |
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34
Primary metric
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia Tech
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wake Forest
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
Notre Dame
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Boston College
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Miami
110 primary output · 85.3 efficiency · 8.7 usage
65.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · Miami
65.8
110 primary · 85.3 efficiency · 8.7 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Miami
39.9
12 primary · 40 efficiency · 7.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8385
Christian Brothers · Sacramento, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
151
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.