Player Dossier

2010-2014

Fresno State

Brandon Connette

QB • 6'2" • Corona, CA, USA

Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator

Brandon Connette is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.1 usage in the latest tracked season.

Usage Score

16.1

Efficiency

40.6

Consistency

17

Season Value

25.1

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Duke

1011121213131414

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Duke • Fresno State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Brandon Connette, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Duke. Brandon Connette is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.1 usage in the latest tracked season.

Brandon Connette played QB for Duke and Fresno State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Brandon Connette recorded 1,709 passing yards, 856 rushing yards, and 94 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Duke.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

Duke paired 1,549 primary output with 54.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 40.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Duke, Fresno State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah

Loss with 217 yards of offense and 63.3 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Fresno State

Games

9

Primary Metric / G

46.7

Efficiency

40.6

Usage

16.1

Consistency

17

Best Game by takeover score

Rice

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Rice: 0. USC: 81. Utah: 217. Unknown: 80. New Mexico: 3. San Diego State: 40. Boise State: 1. San José State: -2. Nevada: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 24 by 30.6. Utah: 40 by 63.3. Unknown: 16 by 60.5. New Mexico: 1 by 75. San Diego State: 7 by 57.1. Boise State: 2 by 5. San José State: 1 by 0. Nevada: 1 by 33.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins10.3 · Games = 4 · -64.5 vs Losses
Losses74.8 · Games = 4 · +64.5 vs Wins
First Half76.2 · Games = 5 · +66.5 vs Second Half
Second Half9.8 · Games = 4 · -66.5 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

9 games

Featured metric

Total Offense

Top game by takeover score

Utah

Best efficiency game

75 vs New Mexico

Result
Thu 12/25@ RiceL 6-30
Sun 11/23@ NevadaW 40-200100.00033.3
Sun 11/9vs San José StateW 38-2401-2-200
Sat 10/18@ Boise StateL 27-375210.5002
Sat 10/4vs San Diego StateW 24-1357.17405.70134
Sat 9/27@ New MexicoW 35-24113100.00075
Sun 9/21vs Unknown5115145.51060.55295.80015
Sat 9/6@ UtahL 27-59162417766.71063.316402.50113
Sat 8/30@ USCL 13-527176841.20330.67131.90015

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Duke

    2010-2013

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Fresno State

    2014

    Final stop

Season Progression

20102011201220122013201320142014
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2010 Regular SeasonDuke44654.221.2
2011 Regular SeasonDuke2138.812-425
2012 PostseasonDuke12941.310.6108
2012 Regular SeasonDuke12941.310.60
2013 PostseasonDuke1,54954.820.31,420
2013 Regular SeasonDuke1,54954.820.30
2014 PostseasonFresno State42040.616.1-1,129
2014 Regular SeasonFresno State42040.616.10

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Virginia

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

118

Primary metric

118 total offense with 91.3 efficiency.

#2

Pittsburgh

424

Primary metric

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.

424 total offense with 66.8 efficiency.

#3

Troy

379

Primary metric

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

379 total offense with 71.5 efficiency.

#4

Utah

217

Primary metric

Loss with 217 yards of offense and 63.3 efficiency.

217 total offense with 63.3 efficiency.

#5

Clemson

27

Primary metric

Loss with 27 yards of offense and 78.6 efficiency.

27 total offense with 78.6 efficiency.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2013 Postseason · Duke

1,549 primary output · 54.8 efficiency · 20.3 usage

52.6

#2

2013 Regular Season · Duke

52.6

1,549 primary · 54.8 efficiency · 20.3 usage

#3

2010 Regular Season · Duke

40.5

446 primary · 54.2 efficiency · 21.2 usage

Milestones

2

250+ passing yards

2

300+ total offense

1

3+ takeover TD games

16

Above avg efficiency

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2010 · Rating 0.8533

Santiago · Corona, CA

Committed To
Duke
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2010

Career Facts

2

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

2,565

Career Total Offense

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.