Usage Score
19.5
Player Dossier
2010-2014Texas A&M
Malcome Kennedy
WR • 6'0" • Cayuga, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Malcome Kennedy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
62.3
Consistency
47.7
Season Value
57.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
1011121213131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Malcome Kennedy, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Texas A&M. Malcome Kennedy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 658 primary output with 71.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 62.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
55.5
Efficiency
62.3
Usage
19.5
Consistency
47.7
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 82. South Carolina: 137. Unknown: 33. Rice: 88. SMU: 76. Arkansas: 44. Alabama: 4. UL Monroe: 4. Auburn: 118. Missouri: 22. LSU: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 7 by 78.1. South Carolina: 14 by 65.2. Unknown: 3 by 73.3. Rice: 7 by 83.8. SMU: 6 by 84.4. Arkansas: 3 by 97.8. Alabama: 4 by 6.7. UL Monroe: 1 by 26.7. Auburn: 4 by 100. Missouri: 3 by 48.9. LSU: 1 by 20
Split Comparison
Wins78.4 · n=7 · +68.8 vs Losses
Losses9.7 · n=3 · -68.8 vs Wins
First Half76.7 · n=6 · +46.5 vs Second Half
Second Half30.2 · n=5 · -46.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/29 | @ West Virginia2+ TD | W 45-37 | — | 7 | 82 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 2 | 22 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs LSU | L 17-23 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Missouri | L 27-34 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Auburn100 receiving yards | W 41-38 | — | 4 | 118 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs UL Monroe | W 21-16 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Alabama | L 0-59 | — | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Arkansas | W 35-28 | — | 3 | 44 | 10.3 | 14.70 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ SMU | W 58-6 | — | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 38 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Rice | W 38-10 | — | 7 | 88 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 18 |
| Thu 8/28 | @ South Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-28 | — | 14 | 137 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220122013201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 140 | 83.9 | 9.9 | 140 |
| 2012 Postseason | Texas A&M | 285 | 61.1 | 9.7 | 145 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 285 | 61.1 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas A&M | 658 | 71.4 | 20.5 | 373 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 658 | 71.4 | 20.5 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Texas A&M | 611 | 62.3 | 19.5 | -47 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 611 | 62.3 | 19.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Missouri
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
SMU
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#4
Auburn
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Mississippi State
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
658 primary output · 71.4 efficiency · 20.5 usage
66.8
#2
2013 Regular Season · Texas A&M
66.8
658 primary · 71.4 efficiency · 20.5 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Texas A&M
57.3
611 primary · 62.3 efficiency · 19.5 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8992
Sumter · Sumter, SC
- Committed To
- Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,694
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.