Usage Score
4.3
Player Dossier
2010-2013Texas A&M
Nehemiah Hicks
TE • 6'4" • Hutto, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Nehemiah Hicks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
20
Consistency
61.7
Season Value
22.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Texas A&M
1010111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nehemiah Hicks, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Texas A&M. Nehemiah Hicks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 141 primary output with 67.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
2
Efficiency
20
Usage
4.3
Consistency
61.7
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 4. Mississippi State: 2. Missouri: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins3 · n=2
First Half3 · n=2
All Games2 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
26.7 vs SMU
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102010201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Texas A&M | 141 | 67.3 | 5.2 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 141 | 67.3 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 106 | 48.2 | 7.5 | -35 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 60 | 57.2 | 6.1 | -46 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 6 | 20 | 4.3 | -54 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Missouri
47
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
38
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Texas A&M
141 primary output · 67.3 efficiency · 5.2 usage
51.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · Texas A&M
51.3
141 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 5.2 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M
41.2
106 primary · 48.2 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9057
Miami Central · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
313
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.