Usage Score
51.5
Player Dossier
2010-2013Vanderbilt
Jordan Matthews
WR • 6'3" • Madison, AL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jordan Matthews reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.6
Consistency
82.8
Season Value
79
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Vanderbilt
10111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Vanderbilt
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Matthews, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Vanderbilt. Jordan Matthews reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Vanderbilt paired 1,477 primary output with 81.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Vanderbilt
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
113.6
Efficiency
81.6
Usage
51.5
Consistency
82.8
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 143. Ole Miss: 178. Unknown: 111. South Carolina: 106. Massachusetts: 76. UAB: 115. Missouri: 123. Georgia: 89. Texas A&M: 92. Florida: 45. Kentucky: 141. Tennessee: 133. Wake Forest: 125
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 5 by 100. Ole Miss: 10 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 100. South Carolina: 8 by 88.3. Massachusetts: 8 by 63.3. UAB: 8 by 95.8. Missouri: 7 by 100. Georgia: 11 by 53.9. Texas A&M: 8 by 76.7. Florida: 5 by 60. Kentucky: 12 by 78.3. Tennessee: 13 by 68.2. Wake Forest: 11 by 75.8
Split Comparison
Wins108.4 · n=8 · -16.4 vs Losses
Losses124.8 · n=4 · +16.4 vs Wins
First Half121.7 · n=7 · +17.5 vs Second Half
Second Half104.2 · n=6 · -17.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/4 | @ Houston100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-24 | — | 5 | 143 | 25.2 | 28.60 | 2 | 50 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Wake Forest100 receiving yards · High volume | W 23-21 | — | 11 | 125 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 41 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | W 14-10 | — | 13 | 133 | 9.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Kentucky100 receiving yards · High volume | W 22-6 | — | 12 | 141 | 12.3 | 11.80 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Florida | W 34-17 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Texas A&MHigh volume | L 24-56 | — | 8 | 92 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs GeorgiaHigh volume | W 31-27 | — | 11 | 89 | 8.3 | 8.10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Missouri100 receiving yards | L 28-51 | — | 7 | 123 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs UAB100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-24 | — | 8 | 115 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ MassachusettsHigh volume | W 24-7 | — | 8 | 76 | 9.3 | 9.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | L 25-35 | — | 8 | 106 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 111 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 1 | 39 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Ole Miss100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-39 | — | 10 | 178 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 55 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Vanderbilt
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 181 | 64 | 14.4 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 778 | 79 | 26.1 | 597 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 778 | 79 | 26.1 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 1,323 | 89.9 | 45.7 | 545 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 1,323 | 89.9 | 45.7 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 1,477 | 81.6 | 51.5 | 154 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 1,477 | 81.6 | 51.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
143
Primary metric
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Carolina
147
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wake Forest
144
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#4
Florida
170
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ole Miss
178
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
178 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Vanderbilt
1,477 primary output · 81.6 efficiency · 51.5 usage
79
#2
2013 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
79
1,477 primary · 81.6 efficiency · 51.5 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Vanderbilt
76.6
1,323 primary · 89.9 efficiency · 45.7 usage
Milestones
19
100+ receiving yards
17
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8467
Madison County · Madison, AL
- Committed To
- Vanderbilt
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,759
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.