Usage Score
18.8
Player Dossier
2010-2013Vanderbilt
Jonathan Krause
WR • 5'11" • Snellville, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jonathan Krause reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.9
Consistency
74.3
Season Value
70.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Vanderbilt
101111121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Vanderbilt
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Krause, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Vanderbilt. Jonathan Krause reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Vanderbilt paired 714 primary output with 87.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Vanderbilt
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
64.9
Efficiency
87.9
Usage
18.8
Consistency
74.3
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 11. Ole Miss: 66. Unknown: 60. South Carolina: 10. Massachusetts: 105. UAB: 108. Missouri: 81. Georgia: 89. Texas A&M: 89. Tennessee: 43. Wake Forest: 52
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 1 by 73.3. Ole Miss: 6 by 73.3. Unknown: 2 by 100. South Carolina: 1 by 66.7. Massachusetts: 6 by 100. UAB: 4 by 100. Missouri: 5 by 100. Georgia: 5 by 100. Texas A&M: 3 by 100. Tennessee: 3 by 95.6. Wake Forest: 6 by 57.8
Split Comparison
Wins68 · n=6 · +6.5 vs Losses
Losses61.5 · n=4 · -6.5 vs Wins
First Half60 · n=6 · -10.8 vs Second Half
Second Half70.8 · n=5 · +10.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/4 | @ Houston | W 41-24 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Wake Forest | W 23-21 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Tennessee | W 14-10 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-56 | — | 3 | 89 | 29.7 | 29.70 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Georgia | W 31-27 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Missouri | L 28-51 | — | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs UAB100 receiving yards | W 52-24 | — | 4 | 108 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 55 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Massachusetts100 receiving yards | W 24-7 | — | 6 | 105 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Carolina | L 25-35 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 60 | 23.7 | 30 | 0 | 56 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Ole Miss | L 35-39 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Vanderbilt
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020112011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 243 | 59.4 | 15.4 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 171 | 49.1 | 18.6 | -72 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 171 | 49.1 | 18.6 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 69 | 47.1 | 7.1 | -102 |
| 2013 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 714 | 87.9 | 18.8 | 645 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 714 | 87.9 | 18.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kentucky
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UAB
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida
23
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Vanderbilt
714 primary output · 87.9 efficiency · 18.8 usage
70.1
#2
2013 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
70.1
714 primary · 87.9 efficiency · 18.8 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
40.8
243 primary · 59.4 efficiency · 15.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8533
South Gwinnett · Snellville, GA
- Committed To
- Vanderbilt
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,197
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.