Usage Score
14.9
Player Dossier
2010-2013Iowa
C.J. Fiedorowicz
TE • 6'7" • Johnsburg, IL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
C.J. Fiedorowicz reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.6
Consistency
68
Season Value
55.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Iowa
101111121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Iowa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
C.J. Fiedorowicz, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Iowa. C.J. Fiedorowicz reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Iowa paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Iowa
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
23
Efficiency
68.6
Usage
14.9
Consistency
68
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 46. Northern Illinois: 15. Unknown: 31. Iowa State: 6. Western Michigan: 12. Minnesota: 13. Michigan State: 21. Ohio State: 29. Northwestern: 26. Wisconsin: 16. Purdue: 19. Michigan: 42. Nebraska: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 4 by 76.7. Northern Illinois: 2 by 50. Unknown: 3 by 68.9. Iowa State: 1 by 40. Western Michigan: 1 by 80. Minnesota: 1 by 86.7. Michigan State: 3 by 46.7. Ohio State: 4 by 48.3. Northwestern: 2 by 86.7. Wisconsin: 1 by 100. Purdue: 2 by 63.3. Michigan: 3 by 93.3. Nebraska: 3 by 51.1
Split Comparison
Wins20.1 · n=7 · -5.3 vs Losses
Losses25.4 · n=5 · +5.3 vs Wins
First Half20.6 · n=7 · -5.3 vs Second Half
Second Half25.8 · n=6 · +5.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ LSU | L 14-21 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Nebraska | W 38-17 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Michigan | W 24-21 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Purdue | W 38-14 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Wisconsin | L 9-28 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Northwestern | W 17-10 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ohio State | L 24-34 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Michigan State | L 14-26 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Minnesota | W 23-7 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Western Michigan | W 59-3 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Iowa State | W 27-21 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Northern Illinois | L 27-30 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 1 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Iowa
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020112011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Iowa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Iowa | 167 | 68.1 | 10.4 | 167 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Iowa | 167 | 68.1 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Iowa | 433 | 58.5 | 21.7 | 266 |
| 2013 Postseason | Iowa | 299 | 68.6 | 14.9 | -134 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Iowa | 299 | 68.6 | 14.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99
Primary metric
99 receiving yards with a 82.5 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#3
LSU
46
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa State
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Iowa
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2012 Regular Season · Iowa
56.9
433 primary · 58.5 efficiency · 21.7 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Iowa
55.1
299 primary · 68.6 efficiency · 14.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.9693
Johnsburg · Mchenry, IL
- Committed To
- Iowa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
899
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.