Usage Score
13.3
Player Dossier
2010-2014Purdue
Justin Sinz
TE • 6'4" • Edgar, WI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Justin Sinz reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
50.3
Consistency
62.2
Season Value
49.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Purdue
1011121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Sinz, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Purdue. Justin Sinz reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Purdue paired 340 primary output with 53 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 50.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
21.4
Efficiency
50.3
Usage
13.3
Consistency
62.2
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 65. Central Michigan: 31. Notre Dame: 26. Unknown: 1. Iowa: 8. Illinois: 25. Michigan State: 20. Minnesota: 20. Nebraska: 22. Wisconsin: 0. Northwestern: 8. Indiana: 31
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 7 by 61.9. Central Michigan: 3 by 68.9. Notre Dame: 5 by 34.7. Unknown: 1 by 6.7. Iowa: 1 by 53.3. Illinois: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 4 by 33.3. Minnesota: 2 by 66.7. Nebraska: 2 by 73.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 0. Northwestern: 1 by 53.3. Indiana: 4 by 51.7
Split Comparison
Wins45 · n=2 · +26.6 vs Losses
Losses18.4 · n=9 · -26.6 vs Wins
First Half26 · n=6 · +9.2 vs Second Half
Second Half16.8 · n=6 · -9.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Indiana | L 16-23 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Northwestern | L 14-38 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Wisconsin | L 16-34 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Nebraska | L 14-35 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Minnesota | L 38-39 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Michigan State | L 31-45 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Illinois | W 38-27 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Iowa | L 10-24 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-30 | — | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 5.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Central Michigan | L 17-38 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Western Michigan | W 43-34 | — | 7 | 65 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 25 | 55.5 | 5.2 | 25 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 48 | 74.4 | 4.8 | 23 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Purdue | 340 | 53 | 16.6 | 292 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 257 | 50.3 | 13.3 | -83 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65
Primary metric
65 receiving yards with a 61.9 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
27
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Purdue
340 primary output · 53 efficiency · 16.6 usage
53.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · Purdue
49.6
257 primary · 50.3 efficiency · 13.3 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Purdue
41.2
25 primary · 55.5 efficiency · 5.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8311
Edgar · Edgar, WI
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
670
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.