Player Stats

Reggie Pegram College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,100
Rushing yards
983
Receiving yards
117
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonPurdue267-1022.1
2011 PostseasonPurdue9442420236.4
2011 Regular SeasonPurdue91248539036.4
2012 Regular SeasonNorth Texas00000-
2013 Regular SeasonNorth Texas839433856658
2014 Regular SeasonNorth Texas125325293562.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season

North Texas paired 532 primary output with 35.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 35.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, North Texas.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida International

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · North Texas

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

44.3

Efficiency

35.7

Usage

23.1

Consistency

47.4

Best Game by takeover score

Florida International

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas: 50. SMU: 82. Louisiana Tech: 19. Nicholls: 62. Indiana: 21. UAB: 24. Southern Miss: 37. Rice: 20. Florida Atlantic: 89. UTEP: -3. Florida International: 114. UTSA: 17

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 15 by 34.7. SMU: 22 by 39.6. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 27.5. Nicholls: 8 by 80.7. Indiana: 7 by 27.1. UAB: 10 by 25. Southern Miss: 6 by 64.2. Rice: 9 by 27.1. Florida Atlantic: 24 by 38.6. UTEP: 6 by 2.5. Florida International: 26 by 45.7. UTSA: 11 by 15.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins86.8 · Games = 4 · +63.6 vs Losses
Losses23.1 · Games = 8 · -63.6 vs Wins