Usage Score
23.1
Player Dossier
2010-2014Purdue
RB • 5'10" • Terrell, TX, USA
Reggie Pegram leans balanced backfield option traits and 35.7 efficiency.
Usage Score
23.1
Efficiency
35.7
Consistency
47.4
Season Value
51.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Reggie Pegram, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · North Texas. Reggie Pegram leans balanced backfield option traits and 35.7 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
North Texas paired 532 primary output with 35.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 35.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, North Texas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
44.3
Efficiency
35.7
Usage
23.1
Consistency
47.4
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 50. SMU: 82. Louisiana Tech: 19. Unknown: 62. Indiana: 21. UAB: 24. Southern Miss: 37. Rice: 20. Florida Atlantic: 89. UTEP: -3. Florida International: 114. UTSA: 17
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 15 by 34.7. SMU: 22 by 39.6. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 27.5. Unknown: 8 by 80.7. Indiana: 7 by 27.1. UAB: 10 by 25. Southern Miss: 6 by 64.2. Rice: 9 by 27.1. Florida Atlantic: 24 by 38.6. UTEP: 6 by 2.5. Florida International: 26 by 45.7. UTSA: 11 by 15.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
80.7 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ UTSA | L 27-34 | 10 | 15 | 1.50 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1.5 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Florida International100 rush yards | W 17-14 | 26 | 114 | 4.40 | 1 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ UTEP | L 17-35 | 5 | 2 | 0.40 | 0 | 1 | -5 | -0.5 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 31-10 | 24 | 89 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Rice | L 21-41 | 7 | 20 | 2.90 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2.2 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Southern Miss | L 20-30 | 6 | 37 | 6.20 | 1 | — | — | 6.2 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ UAB | L 21-56 | 10 | 24 | 2.40 | 0 | — | — | 2.4 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Indiana | L 24-49 | 6 | 14 | 2.30 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | 8 | 62 | 7.80 | 2 | — | — | 7.8 |
| Fri 9/12 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | 7 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 2.1 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs SMU | W 43-6 | 21 | 81 | 3.90 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.7 |
| Sun 8/31 | @ Texas | L 7-38 | 15 | 50 | 3.30 | 0 | — | — | 3.3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2010-2011
Opening stop
North Texas
2012-2014
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 6 | 16.7 | 7.2 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 168 | 43.6 | 5.1 | 162 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 168 | 43.6 | 5.1 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | -168 |
| 2013 Regular Season | North Texas | 394 | 35.5 | 18.8 | 394 |
| 2014 Regular Season | North Texas | 532 | 35.7 | 23.1 | 138 |
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
114
Primary metric
114 scrimmage yards and 50 usage.
#2
Middle Tennessee
95
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
95 scrimmage yards and 31.5 usage.
#3
Unknown
43
Primary metric
Game with 43 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
43 scrimmage yards and 9.5 usage.
#4
Western Michigan
44
Primary metric
Win with 44 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
44 scrimmage yards and 11.8 usage.
#5
Florida Atlantic
89
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
89 scrimmage yards and 37.5 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · North Texas
532 primary output · 35.7 efficiency · 23.1 usage
51.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · North Texas
49
394 primary · 35.5 efficiency · 18.8 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Purdue
33.9
168 primary · 43.6 efficiency · 5.1 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8322
Madison · Dallas, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,100
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Reggie Pegram quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit