Usage Score
25.5
Player Dossier
2010-2012Purdue
O.J. Ross
WR • 5'10" • Ormond Beach, FL, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
O.J. Ross reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
58
Consistency
70.6
Season Value
63.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Purdue
10111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
O.J. Ross, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Purdue. O.J. Ross reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Purdue paired 454 primary output with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Purdue
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
45.4
Efficiency
58
Usage
25.5
Consistency
70.6
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 29. Unknown: 71. Notre Dame: 73. Eastern Michigan: 23. Marshall: 69. Michigan: 46. Wisconsin: 17. Iowa: 57. Illinois: 41. Indiana: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 5 by 38.7. Unknown: 8 by 59.2. Notre Dame: 5 by 97.3. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 30.7. Marshall: 9 by 51.1. Michigan: 8 by 38.3. Wisconsin: 3 by 37.8. Iowa: 4 by 95. Illinois: 7 by 39. Indiana: 2 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins43.6 · n=5 · +2.4 vs Losses
Losses41.3 · n=4 · -2.4 vs Wins
First Half53 · n=5 · +15.2 vs Second Half
Second Half37.8 · n=5 · -15.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
97.3 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-58 | — | 5 | 29 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Indiana | W 56-35 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Illinois | W 20-17 | — | 7 | 41 | 5.9 | 5.90 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Iowa | W 27-24 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Wisconsin | L 14-38 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs MichiganHigh volume | L 13-44 | — | 8 | 46 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs MarshallHigh volume | W 51-41 | — | 9 | 69 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 54-16 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-20 | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs UnknownHigh volume | — | — | 8 | 71 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 149 | 62.2 | 14.1 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 356 | 73.8 | 18.1 | 207 |
| 2012 Postseason | Purdue | 454 | 58 | 25.5 | 98 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 454 | 58 | 25.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73
Primary metric
73 receiving yards with a 97.3 efficiency score.
#2
Minnesota
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Minnesota
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#4
Illinois
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Purdue
454 primary output · 58 efficiency · 25.5 usage
63.5
#2
2012 Regular Season · Purdue
63.5
454 primary · 58 efficiency · 25.5 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Purdue
62.1
356 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 18.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.9
Mainland · Daytona Beach, FL
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
959
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.