Usage Score
18.1
Player Dossier
2010-2014UTEP
Eric Tomlinson
TE • 6'7" • Klein, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Eric Tomlinson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
49.2
Consistency
54.7
Season Value
41.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTEP
101112131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eric Tomlinson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTEP. Eric Tomlinson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
UTEP paired 304 primary output with 60.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 49.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · UTEP
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
16.8
Efficiency
49.2
Usage
18.1
Consistency
54.7
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 6. New Mexico: 9. Texas Tech: 10. Kansas State: 25. Louisiana Tech: 36. UTSA: 5. Rice: 27. Middle Tennessee: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 1 by 40. New Mexico: 1 by 60. Texas Tech: 1 by 66.7. Kansas State: 3 by 55.6. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 40. UTSA: 1 by 33.3. Rice: 4 by 45. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins10 · n=3 · -10.8 vs Losses
Losses20.8 · n=5 · +10.8 vs Wins
First Half12.5 · n=4 · -8.5 vs Second Half
Second Half21 · n=4 · +8.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Utah State | L 6-21 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 24-21 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Rice | L 13-31 | — | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ UTSA | W 34-0 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 3-55 | — | 6 | 36 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Kansas State | L 28-58 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Texas Tech | L 26-30 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 8/31 | @ New Mexico | W 31-24 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020112012201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 83 | 85.9 | 9.9 | 83 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 26 | 43.3 | 7.4 | -57 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 304 | 60.8 | 23 | 278 |
| 2014 Postseason | UTEP | 134 | 49.2 | 18.1 | -170 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 134 | 49.2 | 18.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado State
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 62.5 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma
11
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
304 primary output · 60.8 efficiency · 23 usage
57.8
#2
2011 Regular Season · UTEP
45.3
83 primary · 85.9 efficiency · 9.9 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · UTEP
41.5
134 primary · 49.2 efficiency · 18.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8333
Klein · Spring, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
547
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.