Usage Score
14
Player Dossier
2010-2013UTEP
Devin Patterson
WR • 6'1" • Mesquite, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Devin Patterson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.6
Consistency
67.3
Season Value
62.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTEP
10111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devin Patterson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTEP. Devin Patterson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Devin Patterson played WR for UTEP. Across 4 tracked seasons, Devin Patterson recorded 349 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with UTEP.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
UTEP paired 211 primary output with 67.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
21.1
Efficiency
67.6
Usage
14
Consistency
67.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 12. New Mexico State: 29. UTSA: 13. Colorado State: 22. Louisiana Tech: 21. Tulsa: 24. Texas A&M: 32. North Texas: 5. Florida International: 6. Tulane: 47
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 2 by 40. New Mexico State: 1 by 100. UTSA: 1 by 86.7. Colorado State: 3 by 48.9. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 46.7. Tulsa: 2 by 80. Texas A&M: 1 by 100. North Texas: 1 by 33.3. Florida International: 1 by 40. Tulane: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins17.5 · Games = 2 · -4.5 vs Losses
Losses22 · Games = 8 · +4.5 vs Wins
First Half19.4 · Games = 5 · -3.4 vs Second Half
Second Half22.8 · Games = 5 · +3.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/23 | @ Tulane | L 3-45 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Florida International | W 33-10 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ North Texas | L 7-41 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 11/3 | @ Texas A&M | L 7-57 | — | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 10/13 | vs Tulsa | L 20-34 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 35-38 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Colorado State | L 42-59 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs UTSA | L 13-32 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ New Mexico State | W 42-21 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs New Mexico | L 35-42 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 12 | 80 | 3.8 | 12 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 126 | 66.3 | 7.7 | 114 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 211 | 67.6 | 14 | 85 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Texas A&M
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico State
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
211 primary output · 67.6 efficiency · 14 usage
62.1
#2
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
45.1
126 primary · 66.3 efficiency · 7.7 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · UTEP
34.9
12 primary · 80 efficiency · 3.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8111
North Mesquite · Mesquite, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
349
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.