Usage Score
20.6
Player Dossier
2010-2014UTEP
Jordan Leslie
WR • 6'3" • Houston, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jordan Leslie reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.9
Consistency
45.8
Season Value
55.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UTEP
101112131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UTEP • BYU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Leslie, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UTEP. Jordan Leslie reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
UTEP paired 973 primary output with 79.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UTEP, BYU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · BYU
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
59.9
Efficiency
75.9
Usage
20.6
Consistency
45.8
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 23. UConn: 22. Texas: 85. Houston: 79. Virginia: 41. Utah State: 135. UCF: 21. Nevada: 47. Boise State: 34. Middle Tennessee: 33. UNLV: 68. Unknown: 36. California: 155
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 1 by 100. UConn: 2 by 73.3. Texas: 7 by 81. Houston: 6 by 87.8. Virginia: 4 by 68.3. Utah State: 4 by 100. UCF: 4 by 35. Nevada: 6 by 52.2. Boise State: 5 by 45.3. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 73.3. UNLV: 5 by 90.7. Unknown: 3 by 80. California: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins69 · n=7 · +17 vs Losses
Losses52 · n=5 · -17 vs Wins
First Half58 · n=7 · -4.2 vs Second Half
Second Half62.2 · n=6 · +4.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/22 | @ Memphis | L 48-55 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ California100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 42-35 | — | 5 | 155 | 31 | 31 | 2 | 83 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs UNLV | W 42-23 | — | 5 | 68 | 14.4 | 13.60 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 27-7 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Boise State | L 30-55 | — | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 10/19 | vs Nevada | L 35-42 | — | 6 | 47 | 6.9 | 7.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 10/9 | @ UCF | L 24-31 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Utah State100 receiving yards | L 20-35 | — | 4 | 135 | 33.8 | 33.80 | 0 | 53 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Virginia | W 41-33 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 18 |
| Fri 9/12 | vs Houston | W 33-25 | — | 6 | 79 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Texas | W 41-7 | — | 7 | 85 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 27 |
| Fri 8/29 | @ UConn | W 35-10 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2010-2013
Opening stop
- 2
BYU
2014
Final stop
Season Progression
201020112012201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 430 | 78.9 | 16.4 | 430 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 973 | 79.9 | 25.4 | 543 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 612 | 59.5 | 28.2 | -361 |
| 2014 Postseason | BYU | 779 | 75.9 | 20.6 | 167 |
| 2014 Regular Season | BYU | 779 | 75.9 | 20.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
218
Primary metric
218 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
119
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
California
155
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 98.1 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
973 primary output · 79.9 efficiency · 25.4 usage
64.1
#2
2014 Postseason · BYU
55.5
779 primary · 75.9 efficiency · 20.6 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · BYU
55.5
779 primary · 75.9 efficiency · 20.6 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8478
Tomball · Tomball, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,794
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.