Usage / Role
44%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2012Vanderbilt
QB • 6'1" • Chico, CA, USA
Jordan Rodgers is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
44%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
2
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
12
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Vanderbilt
Snapshot
Player Story
Jordan Rodgers built his college career from 2010 through 2012 as a quarterback from Chico, CA wearing No. 11, spending time with Vanderbilt. The clearest part of Jordan Rodgers' career was his passing role: 4,063...
Read the storyJordan Rodgers, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Vanderbilt. Jordan Rodgers is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 13 | 59 | 26 | 33 | 0 | 60.9 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 13 | 1,885 | 1,498 | 387 | 13 | 60.9 |
| 2012 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 12 | 114 | 108 | 6 | 3 | 73.2 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 12 | 2,496 | 2,431 | 65 | 14 | 73.2 |
Related Context
Jordan Rodgers played QB for Vanderbilt. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jordan Rodgers recorded 4,063 passing yards, 491 rushing yards, and 24 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Vanderbilt.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Vanderbilt paired 2,610 primary output with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 57.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
149.5
Efficiency
57.1
Usage
24.7
Consistency
57.1
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 59. Elon: 44. UConn: -3. Ole Miss: 3. South Carolina: 33. Alabama: 127. Georgia: 126. Army: 282. Arkansas: 306. Florida: 317. Kentucky: 236. Tennessee: 185. Wake Forest: 229
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 23 by 38. Elon: 6 by 68.8. UConn: 3 by 38.5. Ole Miss: 1 by 75. South Carolina: 8 by 57.9. Alabama: 22 by 55.6. Georgia: 30 by 48.1. Army: 45 by 54.5. Arkansas: 45 by 66.6. Florida: 41 by 67.9. Kentucky: 34 by 59.7. Tennessee: 44 by 41.5. Wake Forest: 31 by 70
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
75 vs Ole Miss
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | vs Cincinnati | L 24-31 | 4 | 14 | 26 | 28.6 | 0 | 1 | 38 | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Wake ForestDual-threat | W 41-7 | 7 | 15 | 139 | 46.7 | 1 | 0 | 70 | 16 | 90 | 5.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Tennessee | L 21-27 | 17 | 32 | 193 | 53.1 | 1 | 3 | 41.5 | 12 | -8 | -0.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Kentucky | W 38-8 | 12 | 22 | 207 | 54.5 | 2 | 1 | 59.7 | 12 | 29 | 2.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Florida3+ TD | L 21-26 | 19 | 28 | 297 | 67.9 | 2 | 0 | 67.9 | 13 | 20 | 1.50 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Arkansas3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 28-31 | 15 | 27 | 240 | 55.6 | 1 | 0 | 66.6 | 18 | 66 | 3.70 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs ArmyDual-threat | W 44-21 | 10 | 27 | 186 | 37.0 | 1 | 2 | 54.5 | 18 | 96 | 5.30 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs GeorgiaDual-threat | L 28-33 | 4 | 19 | 47 | 21.1 | 0 | 1 | 48.1 | 11 | 79 | 7.20 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Alabama | L 0-34 | 11 | 18 | 104 | 61.1 | 0 | 2 | 55.6 | 4 | 23 | 5.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ South Carolina | L 3-21 | 4 | 7 | 29 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 57.9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Ole Miss | W 30-7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UConn | W 24-21 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 38.5 | 1 | -4 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Elon | W 45-14 | 3 | 4 | 52 | 75.0 | 1 | 0 | 68.8 | 2 | -8 | -4 | 0 | 1 |
Player Story
Jordan Rodgers built his college career from 2010 through 2012 as a quarterback from Chico, CA wearing No. 11, spending time with Vanderbilt. The clearest part of Jordan Rodgers' career was his passing role: 4,063 passing yards, 24 touchdown passes, 535 attempts, and 491 rushing yards across 25 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2012 with Vanderbilt. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 491 rushing yards and 24 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 25 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Vanderbilt.
The arc is straightforward: Jordan Rodgers moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Vanderbilt
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 1,944 | 57.1 | 24.7 | 1,944 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 1,944 | 57.1 | 24.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 2,610 | 59.9 | 20.1 | 666 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 2,610 | 59.9 | 20.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Arkansas
Week 9 · L 28-31 · Conference game
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
306
Total Offense
86.9 takeover
306 total offense with 66.6 efficiency.
#2
@ Northwestern
Week 2 · L 13-23
268
Total Offense
85.5 takeover
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
268 total offense with 60.1 efficiency.
#3
@ Florida
Week 10 · L 21-26 · Conference game
317
Total Offense
85.2 takeover
Loss with 317 yards of offense and 67.9 efficiency.
317 total offense with 67.9 efficiency.
#4
@ Georgia
Week 4 · L 3-48 · Conference game
227
Total Offense
74.8 takeover
Loss with 227 yards of offense and 60.6 efficiency.
227 total offense with 60.6 efficiency.
#5
vs Army
Week 8 · W 44-21
282
Total Offense
72.5 takeover
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
282 total offense with 54.5 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Vanderbilt
2,610 primary output · 59.9 efficiency · 20.1 usage
73.2
#2
2012 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
73.2
2,610 primary · 59.9 efficiency · 20.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Vanderbilt
60.9
1,944 primary · 57.1 efficiency · 24.7 usage
2
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
4
3+ TD games
10
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.