Usage Score
12.1
Player Dossier
2010-2013Illinois
Miles Osei
WR • 6'0" • Mt. Prospect, IL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Miles Osei reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.2
Consistency
53.6
Season Value
56.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Illinois
1011111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Illinois
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Miles Osei, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Illinois. Miles Osei reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Miles Osei played WR for Illinois. Across 4 tracked seasons, Miles Osei recorded 117 passing yards, 77 rushing yards, and 399 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Illinois.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Illinois paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Illinois
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
29.1
Efficiency
68.2
Usage
12.1
Consistency
53.6
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 24. Cincinnati: 30. Washington: 0. Miami (OH): 19. Nebraska: 0. Wisconsin: 8. Michigan State: 13. Penn State: 60. Indiana: 37. Ohio State: 37. Purdue: 28. Northwestern: 93
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 32. Cincinnati: 3 by 66.7. Miami (OH): 1 by 100. Wisconsin: 1 by 53.3. Michigan State: 1 by 86.7. Penn State: 5 by 80. Indiana: 4 by 61.7. Ohio State: 4 by 61.7. Purdue: 3 by 62.2. Northwestern: 8 by 77.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins25.7 · Games = 3 · -5.3 vs Losses
Losses31 · Games = 8 · +5.3 vs Wins
First Half13.5 · Games = 6 · -31.2 vs Second Half
Second Half44.7 · Games = 6 · +31.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs NorthwesternHigh volume | L 34-37 | — | 8 | 93 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Purdue | W 20-16 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Ohio State | L 35-60 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Indiana | L 35-52 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Penn State | L 17-24 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Michigan State | L 3-42 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Wisconsin | L 32-56 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Nebraska | L 19-39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Miami (OH) | W 50-14 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Washington | L 24-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Cincinnati | W 45-17 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Illinois
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Illinois | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Illinois | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Illinois | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Illinois | 50 | 49.6 | 16.1 | 50 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Illinois | 349 | 68.2 | 12.1 | 299 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93
Primary metric
93 receiving yards with a 77.5 efficiency score.
#2
Northwestern
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
#3
Penn State
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 61.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Illinois
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Postseason · Illinois
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Illinois
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8533
Prospect · Mount Prospect, IL
- Committed To
- Illinois
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
399
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.