Usage Score
19.5
Player Dossier
2010-2012Illinois
Darius Millines
WR • 5'11" • Boynton Beach, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Darius Millines reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
51.9
Consistency
58.2
Season Value
57.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Illinois
1010111112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Illinois
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darius Millines, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Illinois. Darius Millines reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Darius Millines played WR for Illinois. Across 3 tracked seasons, Darius Millines recorded 9 passing yards, -17 rushing yards, and 579 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Illinois.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Illinois paired 319 primary output with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Illinois
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
31.9
Efficiency
51.9
Usage
19.5
Consistency
58.2
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 9. Arizona State: -3. Unknown: 3. Wisconsin: 54. Michigan: 0. Indiana: 80. Ohio State: 37. Minnesota: 51. Purdue: 57. Northwestern: 31
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 1 by 60. Arizona State: 1 by 0. Unknown: 1 by 20. Wisconsin: 5 by 72. Michigan: 1 by 0. Indiana: 5 by 100. Ohio State: 5 by 49.3. Minnesota: 4 by 85. Purdue: 6 by 63.3. Northwestern: 3 by 68.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses38.4 · Games = 8
First Half12.6 · Games = 5 · -38.6 vs Second Half
Second Half51.2 · Games = 5 · +38.6 vs First Half
All Games31.9 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Northwestern | L 14-50 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Purdue | L 17-20 | — | 6 | 57 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Minnesota | L 3-17 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Ohio State | L 22-52 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Indiana | L 17-31 | — | 5 | 80 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Michigan | L 0-45 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-31 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Arizona State | L 14-45 | — | 1 | -3 | -3 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Western Michigan | W 24-7 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Illinois
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102010201120112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Illinois | 42 | 83.4 | 5.6 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Illinois | 42 | 83.4 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Illinois | 218 | 52.4 | 14.1 | 176 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Illinois | 218 | 52.4 | 14.1 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Illinois | 319 | 51.9 | 19.5 | 101 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119
Primary metric
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
#5
Wisconsin
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 72 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Illinois
319 primary output · 51.9 efficiency · 19.5 usage
57.3
#2
2011 Postseason · Illinois
40.9
218 primary · 52.4 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Illinois
40.9
218 primary · 52.4 efficiency · 14.1 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8889
American Heritage · Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Committed To
- Illinois
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
579
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.