Usage Score
15.5
Player Dossier
2010-2014Northwestern
Tony Jones
WR • 6'0" • Flint, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Tony Jones reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
57.3
Consistency
59
Season Value
45.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Northwestern
1011121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Northwestern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tony Jones, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Northwestern. Tony Jones reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tony Jones played WR for Northwestern. Across 5 tracked seasons, Tony Jones recorded 40 rushing yards, 1,445 receiving yards, and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Northwestern.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Northwestern paired 630 primary output with 64.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 57.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Northwestern
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
32.3
Efficiency
57.3
Usage
15.5
Consistency
59
Best Game by takeover score
Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 64. Penn State: 31. Wisconsin: 35. Minnesota: 22. Nebraska: 24. Iowa: 3. Michigan: 59. Notre Dame: 21. Purdue: 14. Illinois: 50
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 7 by 61. Penn State: 3 by 68.9. Wisconsin: 1 by 100. Minnesota: 3 by 48.9. Nebraska: 3 by 53.3. Iowa: 1 by 20. Michigan: 7 by 56.2. Notre Dame: 4 by 35. Purdue: 2 by 46.7. Illinois: 4 by 83.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins25.3 · Games = 4 · -11.8 vs Losses
Losses37 · Games = 6 · +11.8 vs Wins
First Half35.2 · Games = 5 · +5.8 vs Second Half
Second Half29.4 · Games = 5 · -5.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Illinois | L 33-47 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Purdue | W 38-14 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Notre Dame | W 43-40 | — | 4 | 21 | 7 | 5.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Michigan | L 9-10 | — | 7 | 59 | 6.8 | 8.40 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Iowa | L 7-48 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Nebraska | L 17-38 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Minnesota | L 17-24 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Wisconsin | W 20-14 | — | 1 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Penn State | W 29-6 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs California | L 24-31 | — | 7 | 64 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Northwestern
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Northwestern | 157 | 66.7 | 10.1 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | -157 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Northwestern | 335 | 70.1 | 17.1 | 335 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Northwestern | 630 | 64.2 | 24.7 | 295 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Northwestern | 323 | 57.3 | 15.5 | -307 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
63
Primary metric
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Syracuse
185
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
185 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Minnesota
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Illinois
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Boston College
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Northwestern
630 primary output · 64.2 efficiency · 24.7 usage
58.4
#2
2012 Regular Season · Northwestern
52.5
335 primary · 70.1 efficiency · 17.1 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Northwestern
45.5
323 primary · 57.3 efficiency · 15.5 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8567
Grand Blanc Community · Grand Blanc, MI
- Committed To
- Northwestern
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,445
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.