Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2010-2014USC
Markeith Ambles
WR • 6'2" • McDonough, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Markeith Ambles reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.2
Consistency
55.7
Season Value
63.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Houston
1013131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- USC • Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Markeith Ambles, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Houston. Markeith Ambles reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Houston paired 539 primary output with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, Houston.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Houston
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
41.5
Efficiency
86.2
Usage
11.6
Consistency
55.7
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 68. UTSA: 11. Unknown: 7. BYU: 32. UNLV: 21. UCF: 26. Memphis: 40. Temple: 96. South Florida: 16. Tulane: 48. Tulsa: 34. SMU: 41. Cincinnati: 99
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 3 by 100. UTSA: 1 by 73.3. Unknown: 1 by 46.7. BYU: 3 by 71.1. UNLV: 1 by 100. UCF: 3 by 57.8. Memphis: 2 by 100. Temple: 6 by 100. South Florida: 1 by 100. Tulane: 4 by 80. Tulsa: 2 by 100. SMU: 3 by 91.1. Cincinnati: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins45.1 · n=7 · +1.9 vs Losses
Losses43.2 · n=5 · -1.9 vs Wins
First Half29.3 · n=7 · -26.4 vs Second Half
Second Half55.7 · n=6 · +26.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
100 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | @ Pittsburgh | W 35-34 | — | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Cincinnati | L 31-38 | — | 2 | 99 | 49.5 | 49.50 | 1 | 89 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ SMU | W 35-9 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Tulsa | W 38-28 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Tulane | L 24-31 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ South Florida | W 27-3 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Temple | W 31-10 | — | 6 | 96 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Memphis | W 28-24 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 25 |
| Thu 10/2 | vs UCF | L 12-17 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/21 | vs UNLV | W 47-14 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Fri 9/12 | @ BYU | L 25-33 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | L 7-27 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2010
Opening stop
- 2
Houston
2013-2014
Final stop
Season Progression
20102013201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | USC | 3 | 20 | 5 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Houston | 252 | 79 | 11.4 | 249 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 252 | 79 | 11.4 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Houston | 539 | 86.2 | 11.6 | 287 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 539 | 86.2 | 11.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Memphis
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Houston
539 primary output · 86.2 efficiency · 11.6 usage
63.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · Houston
63.4
539 primary · 86.2 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Houston
45.2
252 primary · 79 efficiency · 11.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.9789
Henry County · McDonough, GA
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
794
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.