Player Stats

Deon Hill College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
643
Rushing yards
396
Receiving yards
247
Touchdowns
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech00000-
2011 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech1550139.6
2012 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech8604020136.9
2013 PostseasonGeorgia Tech8440044.4
2013 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech816411549244.4
2014 PostseasonGeorgia Tech1223230062.3
2014 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech12387209178462.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Georgia Tech paired 410 primary output with 76.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 76.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia

Win with 69 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Georgia Tech

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

34.2

Efficiency

76.2

Usage

5.6

Consistency

56.8

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 23. Tulane: 54. Georgia Southern: 31. Virginia Tech: 19. Miami: 16. Duke: 53. North Carolina: 59. Pittsburgh: 17. Virginia: 17. Clemson: 6. Georgia: 69. Florida State: 46

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 5 by 47.9. Tulane: 7 by 76.9. Georgia Southern: 5 by 54. Virginia Tech: 1 by 100. Miami: 2 by 83.3. Duke: 4 by 81.3. North Carolina: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 4 by 44.3. Virginia: 2 by 85.4. Clemson: 1 by 62.5. Georgia: 7 by 91.1. Florida State: 4 by 87.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins28 · Games = 9 · -24.7 vs Losses
Losses52.7 · Games = 3 · +24.7 vs Wins