Player Stats

B.J. Bostic College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
798
Rushing yards
589
Receiving yards
209
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2010 PostseasonGeorgia Tech12000029.9
2010 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech121271270029.9
2011 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech00000-
2012 PostseasonGeorgia Tech1119145056.6
2012 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech11332198134056.6
2013 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech1014911633038.3
2014 PostseasonGeorgia Tech1115150046.6
2014 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech1115611937146.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Georgia Tech paired 351 primary output with 69.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 60.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Loss with 35 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Georgia Tech

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

15.5

Efficiency

60.5

Usage

3.5

Consistency

67.2

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 15. Wofford: 17. Tulane: 13. Georgia Southern: 16. Virginia Tech: -2. Miami: 21. Duke: 35. Pittsburgh: 6. NC State: 20. Clemson: -1. Florida State: 31

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 2 by 78.1. Wofford: 3 by 59. Tulane: 4 by 33.9. Georgia Southern: 2 by 83.3. Virginia Tech: 1 by 0. Miami: 2 by 93.8. Duke: 3 by 98.6. Pittsburgh: 1 by 62.5. NC State: 2 by 91.7. Clemson: 1 by 0. Florida State: 3 by 64.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins11.7 · Games = 9 · -21.3 vs Losses
Losses33 · Games = 2 · +21.3 vs Wins