Usage Score
7.6
Player Dossier
2023-2025Oregon
DB • 6'0" • 205 lbs • Westfield, IN, USA
Dillon Thieneman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.6
Efficiency
33.2
Consistency
37.3
Season Value
22.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dillon Thieneman, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Purdue. Dillon Thieneman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.2 disruption score.
Dillon Thieneman played DB for Purdue and Oregon. Across 3 tracked seasons, Dillon Thieneman recorded 302 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Purdue.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Purdue paired 11.5 primary output with 45 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Oregon.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
33.2
Usage
7.6
Consistency
37.3
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 0. Texas Tech: 1. James Madison: 2. Unknown: 0. Oklahoma State: 1. Northwestern: 0. Oregon State: 0. Penn State: 1. Indiana: 0. Rutgers: 0. Wisconsin: 2. Iowa: 0. Minnesota: 1. USC: 0.5. Washington: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 9 by 37.5. Texas Tech: 12 by 60. James Madison: 7 by 49.2. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Oklahoma State: 2 by 18.3. Northwestern: 5 by 20.8. Oregon State: 5 by 20.8. Penn State: 4 by 26.7. Indiana: 8 by 33.3. Rutgers: 2 by 8.3. Wisconsin: 7 by 49.2. Iowa: 8 by 33.3. Minnesota: 4 by 26.7. USC: 8 by 38.3. Washington: 7 by 59.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
60 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/10 | @ Indiana | L 22-56 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 1/1 | @ Texas Tech10+ tackles | W 23-0 | 12 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/21 | vs James Madison | W 51-34 | 7 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ WashingtonSplash game | W 26-14 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs USC | W 42-27 | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Minnesota | W 42-13 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Iowa | W 18-16 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Wisconsin | W 21-7 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Rutgers | W 56-10 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Indiana | L 20-30 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Penn State | W 30-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Oregon State | W 41-7 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Northwestern | W 34-14 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Oklahoma State | W 69-3 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2023-2024
Opening stop
Oregon
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Purdue | 10 | 44.4 | 12.3 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Purdue | 11.5 | 45 | 10.2 | 1.5 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oregon | 11.5 | 33.2 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oregon | 11.5 | 33.2 | 7.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 65 takeover score.
#2
Michigan State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 60.3 takeover score.
#3
Washington
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.4 takeover score.
#5
Wisconsin
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Purdue
11.5 primary output · 45 efficiency · 10.2 usage
32.4
#2
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
30.7
10 primary · 44.4 efficiency · 12.3 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Oregon
22.2
11.5 primary · 33.2 efficiency · 7.6 usage
3
Impact games
2
Splash games
9
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8647
Westfield · Westfield, IN
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
302
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 39 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.