Usage Score
5.3
Player Profile
Marcus Ratcliffe
S • 6'2" • 209 lbs • Chula Vista, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Marcus Ratcliffe shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
25.8
Consistency
7.7
Season Value
12.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Texas A&M
2324242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- San Diego State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Texas A&M
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Marcus Ratcliffe, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Texas A&M. Marcus Ratcliffe shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 6.5 primary output with 20.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across San Diego State, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
25.8
Usage
5.3
Consistency
7.7
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 0. UTSA: 3. Utah State: 0. Notre Dame: 2.5. Auburn: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Florida: 0. Arkansas: 0. LSU: 0. Missouri: 0. South Carolina: 0. Unknown: 0. Texas: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 6 by 25. UTSA: 7 by 59.2. Utah State: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 8 by 58.3. Auburn: 3 by 12.5. Mississippi State: 8 by 33.3. Florida: 5 by 20.8. Arkansas: 7 by 29.2. LSU: 4 by 16.7. Missouri: 6 by 25. South Carolina: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Texas: 5 by 25.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.6 · n=10 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=2 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · n=7 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half0.1 · n=6 · -0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
59.2 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-9 | 8 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | 8 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State | W 44-22 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
San Diego State
2023
Opening stop
- 2
Texas A&M
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | San Diego State | 4 | 21 | 8.1 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas A&M | 6.5 | 20.4 | 7.2 | 2.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 6.5 | 20.4 | 7.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 6 | 25.8 | 5.3 | -0.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 6 | 25.8 | 5.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.4 takeover score.
#2
Florida
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.4 takeover score.
#3
Notre Dame
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
#4
Fresno State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.3 takeover score.
#5
Utah State
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 42 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Texas A&M
6.5 primary output · 20.4 efficiency · 7.2 usage
22.4
#2
2024 Regular Season · Texas A&M
22.4
6.5 primary · 20.4 efficiency · 7.2 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
12.2
6 primary · 25.8 efficiency · 5.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8656
Cathedral Catholic · San Diego, CA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
165
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.