Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025UTSA
WR • 6'2" • 195 lbs • Dallas, TX, USA
Jamel Hardy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.4
Efficiency
53.6
Consistency
29.2
Season Value
47.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamel Hardy, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA. Jamel Hardy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jamel Hardy played WR for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jamel Hardy recorded 248 receiving yards, 5 tackles, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
UTSA paired 116 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 53.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
16.5
Efficiency
53.6
Usage
7.4
Consistency
29.2
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 54. Rice: 20. North Texas: 6. Tulane: 7. South Florida: 25. Charlotte: 8. East Carolina: 5. Army: 7
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 2 by 100. Rice: 2 by 66.7. North Texas: 1 by 40. Tulane: 1 by 46.7. South Florida: 4 by 41.7. Charlotte: 1 by 53.3. East Carolina: 1 by 33.3. Army: 1 by 46.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Florida International | W 57-20 | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Army | L 24-27 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs East Carolina | W 58-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Charlotte | W 28-7 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 11/7 | @ South Florida | L 23-55 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Thu 10/30 | vs Tulane | W 48-26 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ North Texas | L 17-55 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rice | W 61-13 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Postseason | UTSA | 116 | 72.4 | 5.6 | 116 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 116 | 72.4 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | UTSA | 132 | 53.6 | 7.4 | 16 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 132 | 53.6 | 7.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida Atlantic
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida International
54
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Temple
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · UTSA
116 primary output · 72.4 efficiency · 5.6 usage
56.4
#2
2024 Regular Season · UTSA
56.4
116 primary · 72.4 efficiency · 5.6 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · UTSA
47.5
132 primary · 53.6 efficiency · 7.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8626
Lincoln · Dallas, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
248
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 16 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.