Usage Score
15.6
Player Dossier
2023-2025Akron
WR • 6'1" • 170 lbs • Richmond, CA, USA
Israel Polk reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.6
Efficiency
74.2
Consistency
54.5
Season Value
60.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Akron
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Israel Polk, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Akron. Israel Polk reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Israel Polk played WR for Pittsburgh and Akron. Across 3 tracked seasons, Israel Polk recorded 740 receiving yards, 4 tackles, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Akron.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Akron paired 525 primary output with 74.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Akron.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
43.8
Efficiency
74.2
Usage
15.6
Consistency
54.5
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 13. Nebraska: 4. UAB: 99. Unknown: 47. Toledo: 16. Central Michigan: 14. Miami (OH): 28. Ball State: 72. Buffalo: 67. Massachusetts: 13. Kent State: 67. Bowling Green: 85
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 2 by 43.3. Nebraska: 1 by 26.7. UAB: 4 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Toledo: 2 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 46.7. Miami (OH): 5 by 37.3. Ball State: 5 by 96. Buffalo: 3 by 100. Massachusetts: 1 by 86.7. Kent State: 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/19 | @ Bowling Green | W 19-16 | — | 2 | 85 | 42.5 | 42.50 | 1 | 75 |
| Wed 11/12 | vs Kent State | L 35-42 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Wed 11/5 | vs Massachusetts | W 44-10 | — | 1 | 13 | 6.5 | 13 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Buffalo | W 24-16 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Ball State2+ TD | L 28-42 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Miami (OH) | L 7-20 | — | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Central Michigan | W 28-22 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Toledo | L 3-45 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ UAB2+ TD | L 28-31 | — | 4 | 99 | 24.8 | 24.80 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Nebraska | L 0-68 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Wyoming | L 0-10 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 11 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2023
Opening stop
Akron
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 14 | 93.3 | 4 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Akron | 201 | 54.2 | 11.8 | 187 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Akron | 525 | 74.2 | 15.6 | 324 |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Duke
14
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Akron
525 primary output · 74.2 efficiency · 15.6 usage
60.6
#2
2023 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
50
14 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 4 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Akron
40.1
201 primary · 54.2 efficiency · 11.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8592
St. John Bosco · Bellflower, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
740
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 24 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.