Player Dossier

2023-2025

Tennessee

DeSean Bishop

RB • 5'10" • 208 lbs • Knoxville, TN, USA

Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover

DeSean Bishop leans balanced backfield option traits and 63.2 efficiency.

Usage Score

26

Efficiency

63.2

Consistency

76.6

Season Value

66.4

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tennessee

2324242525

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
Tennessee
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

DeSean Bishop, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tennessee. DeSean Bishop leans balanced backfield option traits and 63.2 efficiency.

DeSean Bishop played RB for Tennessee. Across 3 tracked seasons, DeSean Bishop recorded 1,531 rushing yards, 145 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Tennessee.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Tennessee paired 1,211 primary output with 63.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 63.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas

Win with 146 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Tennessee

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

93.2

Efficiency

63.2

Usage

26

Consistency

76.6

Best Game by takeover score

Illinois

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 101. Syracuse: 126. Unknown: 68. Georgia: 54. UAB: 59. Mississippi State: 72. Arkansas: 146. Alabama: 123. Kentucky: 48. Oklahoma: 89. New Mexico State: 106. Florida: 116. Vanderbilt: 103

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 22 by 49.7. Syracuse: 13 by 87. Unknown: 3 by 100. Georgia: 15 by 37.5. UAB: 9 by 68.3. Mississippi State: 12 by 65.9. Arkansas: 14 by 93.5. Alabama: 14 by 86.6. Kentucky: 14 by 35.7. Oklahoma: 16 by 43. New Mexico State: 20 by 53.3. Florida: 24 by 50.3. Vanderbilt: 21 by 50.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins96.1 · Games = 7 · +2.1 vs Losses
Losses94 · Games = 5 · -2.1 vs Wins
First Half89.4 · Games = 7 · -8.1 vs Second Half
Second Half97.5 · Games = 6 · +8.1 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Scrimmage Yards

Top game by takeover score

Arkansas

Best efficiency game

100 vs Unknown

Result
Tue 12/30@ Illinois2+ TDL 28-3019934.902384.6
Sat 11/29vs Vanderbilt2+ TDL 24-4520974.902164.9
Sun 11/23@ Florida100 rush yards · 2+ TDW 31-11241164.8024.8
Sat 11/15vs New Mexico StateW 42-91680514265.3
Sat 11/1vs OklahomaL 27-3312383.2004515.6
Sat 10/25@ Kentucky2+ TDW 56-3414483.4023.4
Sat 10/18@ Alabama100 rush yards · 2+ TDL 20-37141238.8028.8
Sat 10/11vs Arkansas100 rush yardsW 34-311414610.40110.4
Sat 9/27@ Mississippi StateW 41-3411726.501106
Sat 9/20vs UAB2+ TDW 56-249596.6026.6
Sat 9/13vs GeorgiaL 41-4415543.6003.6
Sat 9/6vs Unknown36822.70022.7
Sat 8/30vs SyracuseW 45-2611827.5012449.7

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Tennessee

    2023-2025

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20232024202420252025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2023 Regular SeasonTennessee0
2024 PostseasonTennessee46560.612465
2024 Regular SeasonTennessee46560.6120
2025 PostseasonTennessee1,21163.226746
2025 Regular SeasonTennessee1,21163.2260

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Arkansas

Win with 146 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

146

Primary metric

146 scrimmage yards and 25.9 usage.

#2

Kent State

120

Primary metric

Win with 120 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

120 scrimmage yards and 9.9 usage.

#3

Syracuse

126

Primary metric

Win with 126 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

126 scrimmage yards and 23.2 usage.

#4

Alabama

123

Primary metric

Loss with 123 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

123 scrimmage yards and 23 usage.

#5

Florida

116

Primary metric

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.

116 scrimmage yards and 35.3 usage.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2025 Postseason · Tennessee

1,211 primary output · 63.2 efficiency · 26 usage

66.4

#2

2025 Regular Season · Tennessee

66.4

1,211 primary · 63.2 efficiency · 26 usage

#3

2024 Postseason · Tennessee

42.2

465 primary · 60.6 efficiency · 12 usage

Milestones

8

100+ rush yards

0

150+ scrimmage yards

7

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2023 · Rating 0.8533

Karns · Knoxville, TN

Committed To
Tennessee
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2023

Career Facts

1

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

1,676

Career Scrimmage Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.