Usage Score
2.7
Player Dossier
2023-2025Ole Miss
Jaylon Braxton
CB • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Frisco, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jaylon Braxton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
15.6
Consistency
7.4
Season Value
11
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Arkansas
23242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Arkansas • Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaylon Braxton, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Arkansas. Jaylon Braxton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.6 disruption score.
Jaylon Braxton played CB for Arkansas and Ole Miss. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jaylon Braxton recorded 45 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Arkansas.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Arkansas paired 2 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 15.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Ole Miss
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
15.6
Usage
2.7
Consistency
7.4
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 1. Georgia: 0. Tulane: 3. LSU: 0. Washington State: 0. Georgia: 0. Oklahoma: 0. South Carolina: 0. Mississippi State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 3 by 22.5. Georgia: 4 by 16.7. Tulane: 1 by 34.2. LSU: 2 by 8.3. Washington State: 2 by 8.3. Georgia: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma: 2 by 8.3. South Carolina: 4 by 16.7. Mississippi State: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.4 · Games = 7 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 2 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · Games = 5 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 4 · -0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
34.2 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/9 | vs Miami | L 27-31 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 1/2 | @ Georgia | W 39-34 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/20 | vs Tulane | W 41-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Mississippi State | W 38-19 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs South Carolina | W 30-14 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Oklahoma | W 34-26 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Georgia | L 35-43 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Washington State | W 24-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs LSU | W 24-19 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Ole Miss
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Arkansas | 9 | 22.2 | 3.5 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arkansas | 2 | 20 | 0 | -7 |
| 2025 Postseason | Ole Miss | 4 | 15.6 | 2.7 | 2 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 4 | 15.6 | 2.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.6 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 47.1 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 40 takeover score.
#4
Ole Miss
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 28.1 takeover score.
#5
Miami
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 19.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Arkansas
2 primary output · 20 efficiency · 0 usage
32.3
#2
2023 Regular Season · Arkansas
29.3
9 primary · 22.2 efficiency · 3.5 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Ole Miss
11
4 primary · 15.6 efficiency · 2.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9397
Lone Star · Frisco, TX
- Committed To
- Arkansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
45
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 18 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.