Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2023-2025Clemson
DB • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Burlington, MA, USA
Ronan Hanafin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.2
Efficiency
25.9
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
13.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ronan Hanafin, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Clemson. Ronan Hanafin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.9 disruption score.
Ronan Hanafin played DB for Clemson. Across 3 tracked seasons, Ronan Hanafin recorded 76 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Clemson.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Clemson paired 0 primary output with 6.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
25.9
Usage
5.2
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 2. LSU: 2. Troy: 2. Georgia Tech: 0. Syracuse: 0. North Carolina: 0. Boston College: 0. SMU: 0. Duke: 0. Florida State: 0. Louisville: 0. Unknown: 0. South Carolina: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 8 by 53.3. LSU: 12 by 70. Troy: 6 by 45. Georgia Tech: 10 by 41.7. Syracuse: 3 by 12.5. North Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Boston College: 6 by 25. SMU: 4 by 16.7. Duke: 2 by 8.3. Florida State: 2 by 8.3. Louisville: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. South Carolina: 3 by 22.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
70 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Penn State | L 10-22 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ South Carolina | W 28-14 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Louisville | W 20-19 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Florida State | W 24-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Duke | L 45-46 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs SMU | L 24-35 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Boston College | W 41-10 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ North Carolina | W 38-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Syracuse | L 21-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Georgia Tech10+ tackles | L 21-24 | 10 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Troy | W 27-16 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs LSU10+ tackles | L 10-17 | 12 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | 6.3 | 1.4 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | 5.4 | 1.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Clemson | 7 | 25.9 | 5.2 | 7 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Clemson | 7 | 25.9 | 5.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 61.3 takeover score.
#2
Penn State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.8 takeover score.
#3
Troy
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#4
South Carolina
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 25.1 takeover score.
#5
Georgia Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 16.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Clemson
0 primary output · 6.3 efficiency · 1.4 usage
35.9
#2
2024 Regular Season · Clemson
35.5
0 primary · 5.4 efficiency · 1.1 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Clemson
13.4
7 primary · 25.9 efficiency · 5.2 usage
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9025
Buckingham Browne & Nichols School · Cambridge, MA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
76
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 22 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.