Usage Score
12
Player Dossier
2023-2025Ole Miss
DE • 6'5" • 245 lbs • Austin, TX, USA
Princewill Umanmielen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
12
Efficiency
37.7
Consistency
61.6
Season Value
52.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Ole Miss
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Princewill Umanmielen, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Ole Miss. Princewill Umanmielen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.7 disruption score.
Princewill Umanmielen played DE for Nebraska and Ole Miss. Across 3 tracked seasons, Princewill Umanmielen recorded 79 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Ole Miss.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 37 primary output with 37.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Nebraska, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with 8 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
2.6
Efficiency
37.7
Usage
12
Consistency
61.6
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 2. Georgia: 0.5. Tulane: 8. Georgia State: 1. Kentucky: 3. Arkansas: 0. Tulane: 3.5. LSU: 1. Washington State: 4. Oklahoma: 3.5. South Carolina: 3. The Citadel: 1.5. Florida: 3. Mississippi State: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 4 by 36.7. Georgia: 7 by 34.2. Tulane: 2 by 58.3. Georgia State: 0 by 10. Kentucky: 4 by 46.7. Arkansas: 3 by 12.5. Tulane: 3 by 47.5. LSU: 0 by 10. Washington State: 5 by 60.8. Oklahoma: 6 by 60. South Carolina: 4 by 46.7. The Citadel: 4 by 31.7. Florida: 1 by 34.2. Mississippi State: 2 by 38.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/9 | vs MiamiSplash game | L 27-31 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 1/2 | @ Georgia | W 39-34 | 7 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/20 | vs TulaneSplash game | W 41-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Mississippi StateSplash game | W 38-19 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | vs FloridaSplash game | W 34-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs The Citadel | W 49-0 | 4 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs South CarolinaSplash game | W 30-14 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ OklahomaSplash game | W 34-26 | 6 | 1 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Washington StateSplash game | W 24-21 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs LSU | W 24-19 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs TulaneSplash game | W 45-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Arkansas | W 41-35 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ KentuckySplash game | W 30-23 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Georgia State | W 63-7 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Nebraska
2023-2024
Opening stop
Ole Miss
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Nebraska | 9.5 | 20.7 | 5.2 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Nebraska | 6 | 13.8 | 3.5 | -3.5 |
| 2025 Postseason | Ole Miss | 37 | 37.7 | 12 | 31 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 37 | 37.7 | 12 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.9 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
8
Primary metric
Win with 8 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
8 disruption/tackle impact with 60.6 takeover score.
#3
Colorado
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.
#4
Washington State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 42.8 takeover score.
#5
Oklahoma
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 42.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Ole Miss
37 primary output · 37.7 efficiency · 12 usage
52.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · Ole Miss
52.8
37 primary · 37.7 efficiency · 12 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Nebraska
25.4
9.5 primary · 20.7 efficiency · 5.2 usage
2
Impact games
11
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9105
Manor · Manor, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
79
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 31 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.