Player Stats

Quinten Joyner College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
699
Rushing yards
603
Receiving yards
96
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2023 PostseasonUSC5110032.3
2023 Regular SeasonUSC51311247132.3
2024 Regular SeasonUSC1256747889464.9
2025 Regular SeasonTexas Tech00000-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

USC paired 567 primary output with 66.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 66.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, Texas Tech.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame

Loss with 96 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · USC

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

47.3

Efficiency

66.3

Usage

11.6

Consistency

60.4

Best Game by takeover score

Notre Dame

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. LSU: 16. Utah State: 93. Michigan: 29. Wisconsin: 59. Minnesota: 44. Penn State: 94. Maryland: 6. Rutgers: 24. Washington: 38. Nebraska: 24. UCLA: 44. Notre Dame: 96

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 5 by 32.1. Utah State: 11 by 85.2. Michigan: 5 by 72.1. Wisconsin: 7 by 85.1. Minnesota: 4 by 95.8. Penn State: 5 by 100. Maryland: 3 by 20.8. Rutgers: 4 by 54.2. Washington: 6 by 66. Nebraska: 8 by 29.5. UCLA: 6 by 68.1. Notre Dame: 11 by 86.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins43.3 · Games = 6 · -7.8 vs Losses
Losses51.2 · Games = 6 · +7.8 vs Wins