Usage Score
8.2
Player Dossier
2023-2025Texas A&M
LB • 5'10" • 227 lbs • Temple, TX, USA
Taurean York shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.2
Efficiency
33.8
Consistency
28.9
Season Value
38.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2024 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Taurean York, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2024 Postseason · Texas A&M. Taurean York shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.8 disruption score.
Taurean York played LB for Texas A&M. Across 3 tracked seasons, Taurean York recorded 229 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 19 primary output with 41.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Win with 7 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
33.8
Usage
8.2
Consistency
28.9
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 2. UTSA: 1. Utah State: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Auburn: 7. Mississippi State: 0. Florida: 0.5. Arkansas: 0. LSU: 0. Missouri: 1. South Carolina: 1.5. Samford: 0. Texas: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 5 by 40.8. UTSA: 10 by 51.7. Utah State: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 5 by 20.8. Auburn: 7 by 79.2. Mississippi State: 10 by 41.7. Florida: 5 by 25.8. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 4 by 16.7. Missouri: 2 by 18.3. South Carolina: 8 by 48.3. Samford: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 11 by 75.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs MiamiSplash game | L 3-10 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas10+ tackles · Splash game | L 17-27 | 11 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Samford | W 48-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | 8 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State10+ tackles | W 31-9 | 10 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs AuburnSplash game | W 16-10 | 7 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State | W 44-22 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA10+ tackles | W 42-24 | 10 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Texas A&M | 16.5 | 36.4 | 8.5 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 16.5 | 36.4 | 8.5 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas A&M | 19 | 41.2 | 10.2 | 2.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 19 | 41.2 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 16 | 33.8 | 8.2 | -3 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 16 | 33.8 | 8.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 72.8 takeover score.
#2
Auburn
7
Primary metric
Win with 7 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
7 disruption/tackle impact with 69 takeover score.
#3
Auburn
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.
#4
Mississippi State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.9 takeover score.
#5
Tennessee
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2024 Postseason · Texas A&M
19 primary output · 41.2 efficiency · 10.2 usage
48.1
#2
2024 Regular Season · Texas A&M
48.1
19 primary · 41.2 efficiency · 10.2 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Texas A&M
44.2
16.5 primary · 36.4 efficiency · 8.5 usage
2
Impact games
14
Splash games
7
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8653
Temple · Temple, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
229
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.