Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
New Mexico State paired 12 primary output with 28.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Bernock Iya College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 53
- TFL
- 3
- QB hurries
- 2
- Passes defended
- 3
- Touchdowns
- 1
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2025 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 12 | 53 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 69.3 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 28.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas State, New Mexico State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kennesaw State
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · New Mexico State
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1
Efficiency
28.4
Usage
10.8
Consistency
58.5
Best Game by takeover score
Kennesaw State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bryant: 2. Tulsa: 2. Louisiana Tech: 0. New Mexico: 1. Sam Houston: 0. Liberty: 0. Missouri State: 1. Western Kentucky: 1. Kennesaw State: 3. Tennessee: 1. UTEP: 1. Middle Tennessee: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bryant: 7 by 49.2. Tulsa: 7 by 49.2. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 8.3. New Mexico: 4 by 26.7. Sam Houston: 2 by 8.3. Liberty: 1 by 4.2. Missouri State: 3 by 22.5. Western Kentucky: 3 by 22.5. Kennesaw State: 8 by 63.3. Tennessee: 7 by 39.2. UTEP: 4 by 26.7. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.3 · Games = 4 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · Games = 8 · -0.4 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Bernock Iya
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.