Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Western Kentucky paired 13.5 primary output with 27.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 5 | 7 | - | 0 | - | 1 | 2 | 13.4 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2024 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 13 | 54 | 6.5 | 4 | 3 | - | 0 | 57.1 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Western Kentucky paired 13.5 primary output with 27.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 27.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Western Kentucky, Oklahoma State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kennesaw State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
27.7
Usage
8.3
Consistency
31.4
Best Game by takeover score
Kennesaw State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0. Eastern Kentucky: 3. Middle Tennessee: 0. Toledo: 1. Boston College: 1. UTEP: 2. Sam Houston: 0. Kennesaw State: 5. New Mexico State: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. Liberty: 0. Jacksonville State: 0. Jacksonville State: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Eastern Kentucky: 5 by 50.8. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. Toledo: 3 by 22.5. Boston College: 8 by 43.3. UTEP: 1 by 24.2. Sam Houston: 2 by 8.3. Kennesaw State: 6 by 75. New Mexico State: 3 by 12.5. Louisiana Tech: 10 by 51.7. Liberty: 2 by 8.3. Jacksonville State: 1 by 4.2. Jacksonville State: 7 by 34.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.